Talk:The Starry Night

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Homework

im doin my home work on it.......wat is the meanin of tha painting????

i no!! isn't there a description that say's sumat lyk "... eleven

amazingly enlarged stars... entwined... cosmic happening" or something ??? if any1 knows this description please tell us!!!! i need to know!!!!!

wow! i found it! if ani1 wants to know the description of starry night,

go to this website (it's ace if ur doing homework!): [[1]] it starts off; "A highly dramatic cosmic event is taking place..." if ani1 reckonnises this, this website is the one u need! xxx

[edit] Name

Several sources suggests that The Starry Night is the common name in english. I'll move the page soon. [2] [3] ✏ Sverdrup 15:26, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

You're correct. One of your references is the museum in which the painting is kept, which I think is sufficiently authoritative. I've gone ahead and moved the article and corrected the name. Rory 16:29, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Incorrect reference to astronomical investigation

I've removed the following:

It was determined 114 years after the painting had been made, in 2003, by the Southwest Texas State University astronomers Russell Doescher and Donald Olson, along with Olson's wife, Marilyn by using astronomical simulation software, that the painting captures the moment in time of 9:08 p.m. on July 13th., 1889 [4]. The composition correlates with the view from the window in his room — the cyprus trees have been confirmed to have existed during the time of his stay.

If you follow the link, it becomes apparent that this is about a different painting, Moonrise (also, anyone could figure out that there's no way you're going to see stars at 21:08 in July). I'll try and see if I can find a better date. Junes 09:41, 1 August 2005 (UTC)


I guess this is oil on canvas. What are the dimensions of the painting? I really like this picture, perhaps I'll do a copy of it sometime. I guess he used prussian and cobalt blue, umber and white and bits of some warm yellow colour and red. --Publunch 15:38, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

OK, I found the dimensions and stuff with a quick google search. Can't guarantee that the source was authoritative though.

[edit] Last painting?

I heard that this was his last and final work before he killed himself..gun shot to the heart. Stevenwagner 05:40, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

No, it's not his last painting. At least that's what our article Vincent van Gogh says. Junes 20:03, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Aurora Borealis?

It looks to me like he was trying to describe, in his medium, the northern lights, which may not have been a common sight in those latitudes at that time. But it certainly looks like the northern lights. I also know it is hard enough to capture it on film or in digital media, as it is always changing, at least in an active storm. Normally it is just another hue in the night sky, slowly shifting as are the stars, but when they are active, what you see is mind-blowing! When you try to capture them, they get away from you, using paint, film, digitization, or paint. You could hope to capture them with video or motion picture technology, but they are really too dim for all of that, and their magnificance is lost. When you have a long exposure film, the stars move. When you have a long exposure light-sensitive CCD, it looks out of focus, regardless of the stability of the stars or terrestrial objects. It is only when the human mind is involved, which can interpret and cast new light, or shadow, on such phenomena, through emotional interpretation, that a strikingly accurate and even recognizable portrayal can be found. He did with his mind and artistic medium, what cannot be done with all of our technological advances today! This is the Aurora Borealis!

[edit] Interesting comparison

Comparison of Don McLean's music and lyrics, with Anne Sexton's poetry, read by Ms. Sexton herself, along with visuals from several sources for comparison. I'm not sure how to add an external links section, not even sure I've added a new topic here correctly, I've just followed how others seem to have done it. Is this how an external links section would be entered on the subject page?

[edit] External links

[edit] Why did he create this painting?

It said he died excatly 13 months before he died, but it didnt say anything about why he painted this painting, WikiPedia should be more specific.

[edit] Quote

Removed from the text:

Often associated with this painting are Van Gogh's words, "Just as we take the train to get to Tarascon or Rouen, we take death to reach a star."

The quote is from a letter written in Arles, not in Saint-Rémy - and this implies to handle this association with caution. And at all, where is often? Please supply sources for this statement! --RPD 20:39, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Common places removed from main page

  • Created by van Gogh while he was in the asylum at Saint Rémy de Provence in June 1889, the painting portrays a swirling skyscape filled with yellow glowing stars above a small town and rolling hills. It was painted by Van Gogh just 13 months before his suicide. The large dark formation in the foreground left of center has been described as the tip of a tree, although art historians have presented various other interpretations. Its purpose seems to be to direct the eye towards the sky. In addition, it adds depth to the painting. A church steeple in the town also points towards the sky, emphasising the sense of looking up. This artwork is considered one of the great masterpieces of its time, as it achieves both beautiful and agitated effects simultaneously.

This is no portrait, not even a landscape, but a painting with its own rules and rights. - What means it has been described, by what art historians? Supply sources! And a tower tends to point to the sky. I don't want to comment the rest. --RPD 23:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pairing with Wheatfield with Cypresses

From the main page:

  • For the exhibition at the Société des Artistes Indépendants Van Gogh suggested pairing The Starry Night with another painting, thought[1] to be Wheatfield with Cypresses, which depicts the same hills in the background. He wrote to Theo, who selected the works to be included in the exhibition:[2]
“
As for the exhibition of the Independents, it's all one to me, just act as if I weren't there. So as not to be indifferent, and not to exhibit anything too mad, perhaps the “Starry Night” and the landscape with yellow verdure, which was in the walnut frame. Since these are two with contrasting colours, it might give somebody else the idea of doing those night effects better than I have.
”
  • Lubin[1] suggests that the imaginary city painted in The Starry Night can be thought of in terms of the "eternal city" in Van Gogh's sermon, the goal of the pilgrim: "Hopeful as he looks up to the eternal city far away, resplendent in the evening glow"[3]
  • In the end neither of these paintings were included in the exhibition.

Remarks:

    • Reference is to the Indépendants 1889, to Starry Night over the Rhone and to a view from the public garden, most ptobably the version now in the Phillips Collection, Washington (cf. image at The Décoration for the Yellow House
    • The village is really not imaginary, but close to reality: see subject.
    • Lubin's psychoanalytical approach often does no longer meet the present state of evaluation of Van Gogh's letters.

--RPD 18:44, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


Thanks ... I'll remove the section from the main article. Stumps 20:10, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] expand this page?

It is a talk page considered to be expanded - so I remove the expand-tag here, and insert it on the main page. --RPD 00:04, 29 October 2006 (UTC)