Talk:The Sponge Who Could Fly
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Curiosity
I was just curious. What is the name of that piece of music in the title screen in the beginning? I was wondering for years what it is called. It has that western-type beat to it. Does anyone know what it is?
--Schultzie 04:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)Schultzie
[edit] Trivia
In the trivia it says that the Patchy segments have been taken out for current airings, but they were in all the times I've seen it. (Including when they only showed the first part) Is this a new thing?
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move —Mets501 (talk) 02:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
The Sponge Who Could Fly (The Lost Episode) → The Sponge Who Could Fly –Actual Name of episode -AMK152 23:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Support per nom -AMK152 23:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Support per nom -Serge 20:46, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support per nom and my comments below. -- Ned Scott 20:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support per nom and Ned Jay32183 21:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support per nom --Milo H Minderbinder 22:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support: Per nom and WP:TV-NC. —Wknight94 (talk) 22:54, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support Nohat 23:45, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strongly oppose — per Ned Scott. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 00:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ned supported, how can you oppose per Ned? I hope you don't mean you oppose because Ned supported. Jay32183 01:24, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Well, looking up at Ned's comment, and looking down to the additional comments he added, it seems that MatthewFenton opposed the move based on the additional commentary Ned made below.--Raguleader 08:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- It still doesn't make any sense. -- Ned Scott 08:53, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Well, after reading the comments here, I agree with the decision to move, but I figured I would just clarify on what Matthew seemed to be saying.--Raguleader 09:50, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- It still doesn't make any sense. -- Ned Scott 08:53, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Well, looking up at Ned's comment, and looking down to the additional comments he added, it seems that MatthewFenton opposed the move based on the additional commentary Ned made below.--Raguleader 08:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ned supported, how can you oppose per Ned? I hope you don't mean you oppose because Ned supported. Jay32183 01:24, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support per nom --`/aksha 10:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support per nom --SpongeSebastian 19:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support per practically everybody. There's already a redirect at The Lost Episode, and after the page is moved there will be one at The Sponge Who Could Fly (The Lost Episode) as well. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support per nom --Caldorwards4 03:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
Add any additional comments
This could be a tricky one. IIRC, "The Lost Episode" was a term used in the promotion of the episode. In other words, it would seem that "(The Lost Episode)" is being used as part of the title itself rather than disambiguation. Even with that in mind, it should still move to "The Sponge Who Could Fly", then note the reference of "The Lost Episode" in the intro. "The Sponge Who Could Fly" is the actual title. -- Ned Scott 20:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- No one is going to look for this episode by both titles, with the second in parentheses. A redirect should exist at The Lost Episode, unless that name is ambiguous, in which case a link at that disambiguation page. Nohat 23:45, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
