Talk:The Sims Wii
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
why did you take all that infromation out?
[edit] The information has been taken out because it wasn't definite fact
I didn't even get the chance to copy any of it down, so thanks to the nitwit that did this, we now are back to square 1.
So... because it wasn't definite fact, it has to be taken down? "This article or section contains information about an unreleased computer or video game. It is likely to contain information of a speculative nature, and the content may change dramatically as more information becomes available " Why don't you go to the Halo 3 article, delete most of it, as it's just speculations? This is no different. 68.146.235.206 17:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Um... yes it is. The Halo 3 article was justified with sources. The most common source being other gaming magazines. This article however had no sources cited, and Hungry_Hippo basically described what he/she saw in the screenshots. He/she should have better understood the standards of encyclopedic content expected here before investing so much time on the article. And not only was the information unverifiable, some of the info included "shout outs" and "thanks" to other Gamespot members. Wikipedia is NOT a bulletin board or a place to take credit. I understand that it seems unfair, and believe me, I've had to learn the hard way myself, but there are guidelines here which I feel obliged to uphold. With that said, I may include a gallery including all the currently released screenshots shortly (If I can figure it out). Cheers. Sillygostly 22:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- Done. Sillygostly 22:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- Um... yes it is. The Halo 3 article was justified with sources. The most common source being other gaming magazines. This article however had no sources cited, and Hungry_Hippo basically described what he/she saw in the screenshots. He/she should have better understood the standards of encyclopedic content expected here before investing so much time on the article. And not only was the information unverifiable, some of the info included "shout outs" and "thanks" to other Gamespot members. Wikipedia is NOT a bulletin board or a place to take credit. I understand that it seems unfair, and believe me, I've had to learn the hard way myself, but there are guidelines here which I feel obliged to uphold. With that said, I may include a gallery including all the currently released screenshots shortly (If I can figure it out). Cheers. Sillygostly 22:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Chibified?
I'm wary of the statement about the design change just being because Japanese audiences are more used to "chibified" characters. Is that from an official source? If it's just speculation, I'd say the change is just as likely just to be part of the Mii integration —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.255.87.66 (talk) 21:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC).
