Talk:The Rainmakers (KC band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia. | ||
[edit] copyvio
The bulk of the text here is a blatant copyvio, copied from an editorial review at Amazon.com. I'm going to strip it back to a stub. Xtifr tälk 06:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, text replaced, the article's a stub now, but a fairly healthy stub, especially considering I knew nothing about the band, and was working only with sources I could find on-line. There's plenty of room for expansion. But at least the article is legal now! Xtifr tälk 08:05, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sources
At least three statements in this article are sourced from a fan user message forum. I looked into one of the claims (about Steven King) by searching for "Steven King" and just "King" in all the messages (subject and body) in all of the forums on the site but was unable to find the specific reference. I'm tempted to pull the reference and relist the statements as "citation needed."--P Todd 05:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huh? Allmusic guide is not a "fan user message forum". (In fact, it doesn't even have a message forum.) It is, in fact, a widely cited and generally reliable source. (Not the best, but generally considered good enough for a first pass, which this is.) The other site, Amazon, does have a public review forum, but the only thing pulled from Amazon came from the Editorial Review section, not the public reviews section. Are you maybe having trouble following references properly? Here's where the Stephen King ref cam from if you want to double-check. It's currently ref#2--it sounds like you were looking at ref#1. Note that I don't know anything about this band. Never heard of them before I stumbled across this article and realized that it needed a rewrite-from-scratch. I made it a stub, but I don't see anything wrong with the sources I used. Nothing here comes from a message forum! Xtifr tälk 17:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Your right and it was my mistake. I looked at the second external reference (a message board) as opposed to the second reference. Thank you for your attention to my query.--P Todd 02:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
