Thaksin Shinawatra $1.88 billion deal controversy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thaksin Shinawatra $1.88 billion deal controversy arose from the Shinawatra-family sale of Shin Corporation to Temasek Holdings. The sale was in response to long-standing criticisms that the Shinawatra family's holdings created a conflict of interest for Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Criticisms of the sale focused on the fact that the transaction was exempt from capital gains tax, the fact that the Thai company was sold to a Singaporean company, and the fact that Thai laws regarding foreign investments in the telecom sector had been amended just prior to the sale.
Contents |
[edit] The sale of Shin Corporation to Temasek Holdings
On Monday January 23, 2006, three days after the Thai Telecommunication Act (2006) became effective on Friday January 20, the Shinawatra-family sold its remaining 49.6% stake in Shin Corporation, a leading Thai telecommunications company, to two nominees of Temasek Holdings (Cedar Holdings and Aspen Holdings). The Shinawatra and Damapong (Potjaman's maiden name) families netted about 73 billion baht (about $1.88 billion). Following Thai tax laws, they did not have to pay capital gains tax.
Likewise, the two families had earlier not paid taxes when Thaksin transferred shares to his sister Yingluck Shinawatra and his wife, Potjaman Shinawatra, transferred shares to her brother Bannapoj Damapong.
The tax exemption was granted on grounds that the transfer, at a par value of 10 baht, took place through the stock market. Although the tax exemption is provided in the law, the sale drew heavy criticism over Thaksin's ethics on the grounds that Shin Corp, a dominant player in Thailand's information technology sector, will be sold to an investment arm of the Government of Singapore.
[edit] Legal investigation
The Thailand Securities and Exchange Commission investigated the transaction. "The investigation concluded that Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra and his daughter Pinthongta are clear from all wrongdoing," said SEC secretary-general Thirachai Phuvanatnaranubala on February 23, 2006.[1] However, the SEC did find that Thaksin's son, Panthongtae, violated rules with regard to information disclosure and public tender offers in transactions between 2000 and 2002.[2] He was fined 6 million THB (about 150,000USD). "The case is not severe because Panthongtae did inform the SEC but his report was not totally correct" said the SEC's deputy chief Prasong Vinaiphat.[3]
Allegations of insider trading by the Shinawatra family, Shin Corporation Corp executives, and major shareholders were also investigated. No irregularities were found.[4]
[edit] Controversy
The transaction made the Prime Minister the target of accusations that he was selling an asset of national importance to a foreign entity, and hence selling out his nation. The Democrat party spokesman called Thaksin worse than Saddam for not protecting the Thai economy from foreigners: "Dictator Saddam, though a brutal tyrant, still fought the superpower for the Iraqi motherland."[5][6] Supporters, however, counter that Thailand's mobile phone industry is highly competitive, and that little criticism was raised when the Norwegian firm Telenor acquired Total Access Communications, the country's second largest operator. Democrat Party leader Abhisit Vejjajiva had criticized Thaksin earlier for not sufficiently opening up the Thai telecom sector to foreigners.[7][8] Supporters further counter that the complete sale of Shin Corporation by the Shinawatra-Damapong families had been a long-standing demand of some public groups,[9] as it would allow Thaksin to undertake his duties as Prime Minister without accusation of conflicts of interest.
The controversy surrounding the sale gave additional momentum to an already-planned anti-Thaksin rally, which took place during February 4-5th at The Royal Plaza, near the parliament building and the royal palace. At least 100,000 protesters, led by media figure Sondhi Limthongkul, gathered around demanding the resignation of the Prime Minister, and submitted a petition to the Privy Council chairman General Prem Tinsulanonda and the Office of His Majesty's Principal Private Secretary, intended for His Majesty the King Bhumibol Adulyadej. Meanwhile, rallies also took places in several southern provinces.
The resulting political turmoil forced Thaksin to order the dissolution of the Lower House on February 24, 2006.
[edit] Use of nominees
Kularb Kaew was the holding company used to acquire Shin Corp. Kularb Kaew was, in turn owned by a small group of Thai nominee shareholders, including Pong Sarasin, a son of the former Thai Prime Minister and the brother of Arsa Sarasin, King Bhumibol's principle private secretary. This use of local nominees of foreign owners was attacked by some anti-Thaksin groups as a method to get around laws limiting foreign ownership of Thai companies. Subsequent investigations found that Thai nominees owned 24.1% of all shares on the Thai stock exchange, and up to 36% of all shares in the technology sector. Efforts to clamp down on use of Thai nominees could potentially cause a significant outflow of capital from the Thailand. An official investigation of the use of nominees is currently in progress.[10]
[edit] After the coup
On 16 October 2006, nearly a month after a military junta overthrew the government of Thaksin Shinawatra in a coup, Temasek issued a statement to signal the eventual reduction in its holding in Shin Corp. However, the government said that it would continue with its legal action to follow up on its investigation on whether Kularb Kaew is a nominee of Temasek.[11]
Chairman Pong Sarasin was later removed from the Board of Directors, and replaced by Mom Rajawongse Tongnoi Tongyai, the private secretary of Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn. The Crown Prince Office, later, declared that Mom Rajawongse Tongnoi Tongyai has never been the secretary of the Crown Prince but was only a low ranking officer in the office.
The junta's interpretation of the Foreign Business Act of 1999, which defines nominees and limits foreign investment in Thai companies, could have far reaching consequences for foreign investment in Thailand.[12]
[edit] References
- ^ http://sg.news.yahoo.com/060223/1/3ywh2.html
- ^ http://www.bangkokpost.net/breaking_news/breakingnews.php?id=81324
- ^ http://www.brunei-online.com/weekend/news/mar11w12.htm
- ^ http://bangkokpost.net/Business/07Apr2006_biz35.php
- ^ http://sanpaworn.vissaventure.com/log/261/worse-than-saddam
- ^ http://www.matichon.co.th/matichon/matichon_detail.php?s_tag=01p0102300149&day=2006%2F01%2F30
- ^ http://sanpaworn.vissaventure.com/log/237/abhisit-vejjajiva-economic-nationalist
- ^ http://www.matichon.co.th/matichon/matichon_detail.php?s_tag=01soc05191248&day=2005%2F12%2F19
- ^ http://www.ipsnews.org/interna.asp?idnews=24328
- ^ "Nominees likely to face more scrutiny", Bangkok Post, 26 August 2006.
- ^ The Nation, Temasek may lose heavily on sale, 18 October 2006
- ^ Bangkok Post, Who can own what?, 23 November 2006
[edit] External links
- Ample Rich Scandal
- CNN news report (audio clip)
- www.korbsak.com (in Thai)
- Shin Corp Sale on 2Bangkok.com
|
|||||
Main events | Timeline | Key persons and organizations | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prelude Main events
Elections
|