User talk:Terence Ong
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Hello, welcome to my talk page. Feel free to drop a message. :) I will reply to you asap on your talk page.
[edit] Opus Dei: a section title and balanceTerence-- thank you so much for helping out before by lending your eyes to Opus Dei. This is an issue that attracts lots of passionate people on all sides, so true outsider eyeballs are greatly prized by all. :) If you have a second, could you look things over and give us some feedback? Here's the latest on Talk:Opus Dei. One issue is on whether it's acceptable to have section entitled "Criticism and 'cult' allegations". It's undisputed that notable cult allegations are being made and are they are the #1 criticism of the organization. However, one school of thought holds that referring to the "cult allegations" in the section titles is so prejudicial that we shouldn't cut it from the header. I say that if the allegations are notable enough to have section, they're notable enough to have a title that reflects their mention-- but there are some good editors who have made points in opposition. A second question going on is whether the article complies with NPOV. Are the "criticisms" and the "support" section 'balanced', or are we giving undue weight to one side or the other. I think we're doing pretty good on that at the moment, but there are a lot of different ideas all over the spectrum on what those sections should look like, so anything you can do to help us strike the right balance and get to FAC would be much appreciated! Thanks for all your advice and help. --Alecmconroy 20:04, 2 December 2006 (UTC) [edit] Thank youThank you for your support on my RfA. My nomination succeeded and I've been made an admin. I appreciate your support. Thanks again! =) -- Gogo Dodo 05:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC) [edit] WikiBreakHey! I saw your message on the EA page. Sorry to hear that you caught the WikiFlu... hopefully it won't last long! Have a nice break; we look forward to seeing you back after your holiday, hopefully well recovered :-) — Editor at Large(speak) 07:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Hope you come back from your holiday refreshed and recharged. All the best, Jam01 03:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for December 4th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC) [edit] Pygmy pygmy hipposI just read that your upload of the The pygmy hippopotamus exhibit at the Singapore Zoo is the 1 millionth upload to Commons, congrats! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:08, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Thank you everyone. Will keep on uploading more pictures of my photography collection in my PC. Terence Ong 09:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC) [edit] New page?Should we have these page: Monorail (Singapore) and List of Singapore Monorail Stations? PS: Reply at my talk page would be better. Ragnaroknike 10:08, 5 December 2006 (UTC) [edit] YouYou have been added to the party list in the Medcom case. WikieZach| talk 11:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC) [edit] My RfAI would like to take the time to thank you for voting in my unsuccessful RFA. I appreciate your comment and will be more civil in the future. Have a nice day! -- Chris is me 14:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC) [edit] AfdHello I would ask that you re-look over your status on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metropolis (Japanese magazine). Its not up for deletion due to non-notability; but, do to the article is just one big advertisement. It dosen't have any inline citations and claims a whole bunch of things because its the only one in that category. --Simonkoldyk 17:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC) [edit] Tuas Bus TerminalHi Terence. I was wondering if you could help out at Tuas Bus Terminal. I prod'd it as having no text/context. I could add something like "Tuas Bus Terminal is a bus terminal in Singapore", but that is hardly better than the way it is now. You're the only person I know who lives in Singapore, so I thought you might be able to help. (As a side note, I fail to see how an ordinary bus terminal is notable, but.. whatever.) --Fang Aili talk 22:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your input is requestedYour input would be appreciated at this Request for Comments. Kelly Martin (talk) 15:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC) [edit] 3nd AFD nom for List of Battlefield 1942 modsYou may be interested in the List of Battlefield 1942 mods AFD. Bfelite 14:07, 15 June 2006 (UTC) [edit] Request for MediationThis message delivered: 04:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC).
Hello there, my name is Peter M Dodge and I go by the handle Wizardry Dragon on Wikipedia. While I am not a member of the Mediation Committee proper I have offered to mediate this case. If this is okay with you, I would like to proceed. Please let me know either way, and if you have any issues with this please let me know so I may try to address them. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge aka "Wiz" (Talk to Me) (Support Neutrality) 00:21, 12 December 2006 (UTC) [edit] 1,000,000th Commons imageJust read the press release that said you uploaded the 1,000,000th image to the commons. Congratulations! :) thadius856talk|airports|neutrality 03:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC) [edit] Thank you for votingThank you for voting in my RfA which at 51/20/6 unfortunately did not achieve consensus. In closing the nomination, Essjay remarked that it was one of the better discussed RfAs seen recently and I would like to thank you and all others who chose to vote for making it as such. It was extremely humbling to see the large number of support votes, and the number of oppose votes and comments will help me to become stronger. I hope to run again for adminship soon. Thank you all once more. Wikiwoohoo 19:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[edit] Signpost updated for December 11th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC) [edit] Concordia NewsletterConcordia is currently trying to relaunch. I, and all the members of the ex-council, wish to welcome new members to the group. We are a group who aim to promote remaining civil, in an environment where messages can easily be interpretated wrongly. [edit] Help out now!
We are a community, so can only work though community contributions and support. It's the helping that counts. [edit] Decision MakingThe council expired one month ago, but due to the current position of the group the current council will remain until the position of the group can be assessed, and whether it would be sensible to keep Concordia going. For most decisions, however, it will be decided by all who choose to partake in discussions. I am trying to relaunch because of the vast amounts of new members we have received, demonstrating that the aims are supported. If you wish to opt of of further talk-page communications, just let us know here. - Ian¹³/t 20:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC). Kindly delivered by MiszaBot. |