Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States |
||||||||||||
Argued April 18, 1978 Decided June 15, 1978 |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Holding | ||||||||||||
A permanent injunction was affirmed, thus ceasing construction of the dam. | ||||||||||||
Court membership | ||||||||||||
Chief Justice: Warren E. Burger Associate Justices: William J. Brennan, Potter Stewart, Byron White, Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, Lewis Franklin Powell, Jr., William Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens |
||||||||||||
Case opinions | ||||||||||||
Majority by: Burger Joined by: Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall, Stevens Dissent by: Powell Joined by: Blackmun Dissent by: Rehnquist |
||||||||||||
Laws applied | ||||||||||||
U.S. Const. |
Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill et al., or TVA v. Hill, 437 U.S. 153 (1978), was a United States Supreme Court case. It is a commonly cited example of the canon of construction (expressio unius est exclusio alterius).
Contents |
[edit] Background
The Tennessee Valley Authority started the building of the Tellico Dam on the Little Tennessee River and was constructing the dam when an endangered fish species, the snail darter, was found upstream. The Endangered Species Act had been passed after construction had begun. The dam would completely inundate the location where the snail darter was found, resulting in considerable harm to the snail darter.
[edit] Case
The case was brought to force cessation of the building of the dam. The Tennessee Valley Authority contended that since the dam began construction prior to the passage of the 1973 Endangered Species Act, it was exempt.
[edit] Decision
A permanent injunction was affirmed, thus ceasing construction of the dam.