Wikipedia:Templates with red links

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has a backlog that requires the attention of experienced Wikipedia editors.
Please remove this notice when the backlog is cleared.
Active Wiki Fixup Projects
Leading the charge in the War on Error!
Must be active, systematic, have lists, & need help.
Writing
Dead-end pages

These pages are not wikified.
(Updated 22 September 2006)

Neglected articles
Most wanted stubs
Shortpages

(Updated from January 25 2006 dump, all still active as of April 2006)

Most wanted articles
Articles requested for
more than a year
Missing articles

Wikipedia is not as complete as you might think!
(ongoing)

Other
Uncategorised articles

Help categorise articles.

Orphaned articles

Help link to these orphaned articles.

Stubsensor

Help remove stub tags from articles they don't belong on.

Articles that need to be wikified

Massive backlog.

Orphaned talk pages

Talk pages without corresponding articles. Administrators only.

Disambiguation pages with links

(Updated November 30, 2006)

Templates with red links

(Updated January 25 2006)

Linkrot

Fix broken links to external websites.
(Updated December 13 2005)

Transwiki log cleanup

Articles that have been transwikied and need to be checked for possible merging or deletion.

Main - Inactive - Mini

This page lists templates with red links (which lead to non-existent internal pages). Parameterized links, links to images, category membership links, interwiki links, and Special: links are not checked.

Contents

[edit] How can I help?

Visit each template and get a sense of what's going on. If the article referenced by a red link deserves to exist, you can start it and then mark it as a stub. If you think an existing article will fit the bill, you can change the link to point to it directly. It might be a good idea to create a redirect from the original target of the red link, so future linkers can benefit from your work. If you think no article with that title should ever, ever exist, you can remove the link. It's perfectly fine and indeed encouraged, to leave red links to useful potential articles, as a signal to other editors that the article needs to be created. (See also Wikipedia:Most wanted articles).

If all the redlinks in a template are links to useful potential articles which do not currently exist, you may want to strike them (using <s> and </s>), to show that the have been checked. This will also help with removing false positives when the list is next updated.

If you come across an entire template that you think should not exist, please review the applicable standards at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion, and, if appropriate, nominate that template for deletion.

In order to help people find this project, consider using an edit summary like the following: Template red link repair ([[Wikipedia:Templates with red links|You can help!]])

[edit] Updating

You can ask User:Beland to update, if necessary.

This list is as of the January 25, 2006, database dump.

[edit] Suggestions for improvement

[edit] Origins

Requested by User:BD2412.

[edit] Listings

(These are split up because they are very long.)

[edit] January, 2006

[edit] Specialized templates


[edit] September, 2005

  • 438 of 935 (46.8%) left on /2005-09-09.1-2 - 1 to 2 redlinks per template
  • 385 of 458 (84.1%) left on /2005-09-09.3-5 - 3 to 5 redlinks per template
  • 351 of 393 (89.3%) left on /2005-09-09.6-10 - 6 to 10 redlinks per template
  • 298 of 323 (92.3%) left on /2005-09-09.11-20 - 11 to 20 redlinks per template
  • 270 of 285 (94.7%) left on /2005-09-09.21-plus - 21 or more redlinks per template (links to templates only)