Wikipedia:Template messages/Disputes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
These templates should never be used on other templates, as this leads to the appearance of very large numbers of articles being disputed.
Please remember to use these appropriately, and use the most specific messages you can find for the situation.
Contents |
[edit] For placement at top of article
What to type | What it makes | Where it goes | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
{{ActiveDiscuss}} |
|
Top of article, section, or talk page | ||||
{{Blpdispute}} |
|
Disputed biographies of living persons top |
||||
{{Contradict}} |
Self-contradicting article top |
|||||
{{Contradict-other|[[Article]]}} |
One or both contradicting articles top |
|||||
{{Disputed}} |
Disputed articles top |
|||||
{{Disputeabout|'''The topic of dispute'''}} |
Disputed articles with list of topics top |
|||||
{{Disputed-category}} |
Disputed articles top |
|||||
{{Hoax}} |
Suspected hoaxes top |
|||||
{{Importance}} |
Apparently unimportant topic top |
|||||
{{noncompliant}} |
|
Non-compliant article top |
||||
{{notability|
|
Non-notable topic, listing the specific guideline at issue top |
|||||
{{notability}} |
Non-notable topic or failing to meet the current notability guidelines (verbose) top |
|||||
{{POV}} |
Disputed articles top |
|||||
{{POV-check}} |
Possibly biased articles top |
|||||
{{TotallyDisputed}} |
Disputed articles top |
|||||
{{Unencyclopedic}} |
Articles with unencyclopedic topic (not unused, although it may be redundant) top |
|||||
{{POV-title}} |
Disputed article sections under title |
|||||
{{Unbalanced}} |
Articles which contain Unbalanced citations. | |||||
{{Autobiography}} |
Articles which are autobiographies and may not be NPOV because of that. |
|||||
{{Autobiography|date-flagged}} |
Articles which are autobiographies and may not be NPOV because of that, with the date at which they were flagged. |
[edit] For placement at top of article or section
What to type | What it makes | Where it goes |
---|---|---|
{{Disputed-section}} |
Disputed sections top |
|
{{Not verified}} |
Possibly inaccurate articles top |
|
{{Citecheck}} |
At the top of an article or section where the text misrepresents the sources cited. | |
{{OriginalResearch}} |
Possible original research. | |
{{Advert}} |
Pages that promote commercial products or services | |
{{Sermon}} |
Pages that promote a particular religious point of view | |
{{Magazine}} |
Pages that read like a magazine article instead of the formal tones expected of an encyclopedia. | |
{{Story}} |
Pages that read like a narrative and tell a story rather than providing encyclopaedic information. | |
{{mergedisputed|OTHER ITEM}} |
|
|
{{Content}} |
Above the site of dispute in article or section | |
{{weasel}} |
Article or section that has weasel words | |
{{Missing information|Info}} |
Article or section where information not present may be worthy of inclusion | |
{{Self-published|Source}} |
On an article where a self-published (online or in print) source is cited, and is therefore not legitimately citable as a secondary source, according to policy. | |
{{Contradict-section}} |
Section which contains conflicting information | |
{{Incoherent}} |
Section where some sentences in a section or the text as a whole does not relay an understandable message |
[edit] For placement in or at top of a section
What to type | What it makes | Where it goes |
---|---|---|
{{Sectfact}} |
Disputed article sections under section header |
|
{{POV-section}} |
Disputed article sections under section header |
|
{{TotallyDisputed-section}} |
Disputed article sections under section header |
|
{{SectOR}} |
Section contains possible original research. | |
{{POV-intro}} |
|
Disputed article intro top |
{{Unverifiable-external-links}} |
Section contains links to unverifiable external sites. |
[edit] For inline article placement
What to type | What it makes | Where it goes |
---|---|---|
{{fact}} or {{citation needed}} |
After factual claims that need a citation to back them up. in-line |
|
{{Verify source}} or {{Check}} |
After suspect citations or source references in-line |
|
{{Lopsided}} |
Lopsided | |
{{Verify credibility}} |
[this source's credibility needs verifying] |
After suspect citations or source references in-line |
{{Dubious}} |
Disputed statements in-line |
|
{{failed verification}} |
After factual claims that have been checked and not found in the indicated source. Explain in Talk. in-line |
|
{{or}} |
After text passages based upon original research in-line |
|
{{Nonspecific}} or {{Unverifiable}} |
[not specific enough to verify] |
After factual claims that could be relevant, but are not cited and are too general for a {{fact}}. in-line |
{{Who}} |
After passages mentioning general groups (such as "many scientists") that could be made more specific by naming (and citing sources for) specific individuals. in-line |
[edit] For placement on talk pages of articles
What to type | What it makes | Where it goes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{Calm talk}} |
Talk pages which are likely to have incivil or hot-headed disputes. | |||
{{ActiveDiscuss}} |
|
Talk page or section top |
||
{{Controversial}} |
Talk page top |
|||
{{Controversial3}} |
Talk page top |
[edit] For placement on talk pages of users
Categories: Disputed biographies of living persons | Self-contradictory articles | Articles contradicting other articles | Accuracy disputes | Suspected hoax articles | Wikipedia articles with topics of unclear importance | NPOV disputes | Articles which may be biased | Articles which may be unencyclopedic | Autobiographical articles | Wikipedia articles needing factual verification | Articles lacking sources | All articles lacking sources | Articles which may contain original research | Wikipedia articles needing style editing | Items to be merged | Articles with weasel words | Wikipedia external links cleanup | Wikipedia controversial topics | Articles with disputed merge proposals