Wikipedia:Template messages/Disputes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

These templates should never be used on other templates, as this leads to the appearance of very large numbers of articles being disputed.

Please remember to use these appropriately, and use the most specific messages you can find for the situation.

Shortcut:
WP:TD
WP:TM/DISP

Contents

[edit] For placement at top of article

What to type What it makes Where it goes
{{ActiveDiscuss}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Accuracy dispute This article or section is currently being developed or reviewed.
Some statements may be disputed, incorrect, biased or otherwise objectionable.
Please read talk page discussion before making substantial changes.
Top of article, section, or talk page
{{Blpdispute}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Accuracy dispute This biography of a living person may violate Wikipedia policy.
Wikipedia biographies may not contain unsourced or poorly sourced controversial claims. In addition, all articles must be neutral, verifiable, encyclopedic and free of original research.
Please see discussion on the talk page and the living persons biography noticeboard. If a claim indisputedly violates policy, remove it immediately instead of using this template.
Disputed biographies of living persons
top
{{Contradict}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Self-contradicting article
top
{{Contradict-other|[[Article]]}}

Edit
Talk
Links

One or both contradicting articles
top
{{Disputed}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Disputed articles
top
{{Disputeabout|'''The topic of dispute'''}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Disputed
The factual accuracy of part of this article is disputed.
The dispute is about The topic of dispute.
Please see the relevant discussion on the talk page.
Disputed articles with list of topics
top
{{Disputed-category}}

Edit
Talk
Links

The inclusion of one or more of the categories on this page is disputed.
Please see the relevant discussion on the talk page.
Disputed articles
top
{{Hoax}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Suspected hoax The truthfulness of this article has been questioned.
It is believed that some or all of its content might constitute a hoax.
Please add reliable sources for the claims in the article or comment on the article's talk page.
Suspected hoaxes
top
{{Importance}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Apparently unimportant topic
top
{{noncompliant}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Accuracy dispute This article may not be compliant with the content policies of Wikipedia.
To be compliant, it must be written from a neutral point of view and must not include unverifiable, unsuitable material, or original research.
Please see the relevant discussion on the talk page.
Non-compliant article
top
{{notability|
guideline (e.g. "Biographies")}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Non-notable topic, listing the specific guideline at issue
top
{{notability}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Non-notable topic or failing to meet the current notability guidelines (verbose)
top
{{POV}}

Edit
Talk
Links

The neutrality of this article is disputed.
Please see the discussion on the talk page.
Disputed articles
top
{{POV-check}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Possibly biased articles
top
{{TotallyDisputed}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Disputed articles
top
{{Unencyclopedic}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Articles with unencyclopedic topic (not unused, although it may be redundant)
top
{{POV-title}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Neutrality dispute The neutrality of this article's title and/or subject matter is disputed.
This is a dispute over the neutrality of viewpoints implied by the title, or the subject matter within its scope, rather than the actual facts stated. Please see the relevant discussion on the talk page.
Disputed article sections
under title
{{Unbalanced}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Articles which contain Unbalanced citations.
{{Autobiography}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Articles which are autobiographies and may not be NPOV because of that.
{{Autobiography|date-flagged}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Articles which are autobiographies and may not be NPOV because of that, with the date at which they were flagged.

[edit] For placement at top of article or section

What to type What it makes Where it goes
{{Disputed-section}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Disputed sections
top
{{Not verified}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Some information in this article or section has not been verified and may not be reliable.
Please check for any inaccuracies, and modify and cite sources as needed.
Possibly inaccurate articles
top
{{Citecheck}}

Edit
Talk
Links

At the top of an article or section where the text misrepresents the sources cited.
{{OriginalResearch}}

Edit
Talk
Links

This article or section may contain original research or unverified claims.
Please help Wikipedia by adding references. See the talk page for details.
Possible original research.
{{Advert}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Pages that promote commercial products or services
{{Sermon}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Pages that promote a particular religious point of view
{{Magazine}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Pages that read like a magazine article instead of the formal tones expected of an encyclopedia.
{{Story}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Pages that read like a narrative and tell a story rather than providing encyclopaedic information.
{{mergedisputed|OTHER ITEM}}


Edit
Talk
Links
(category)

  • Use this template if there is a dispute as to whether or not two articles should be merge.
  • Place this at the top of both articles or sections that are to be merged. Use the other item's name as the parameter. A link will be generated automatically.
{{Content}}

Edit
Talk
Links

The relevance of particular information in (or previously in) this article or section is disputed.
The information may have been removed or included by an editor as a result.
Please see discussion on the talk page considering whether its inclusion is warranted.
Above the site of dispute in article or section
{{weasel}}

Edit
Talk
Links

The neutrality of this article or section may be compromised by weasel words.
You can help Wikipedia by improving weasel-worded statements.
Article or section that has weasel words
{{Missing information|Info}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Concern has been expressed that this article or section is missing information about: Info.
The specific information has been noted on the talk page where it may be discussed whether to include it.
Article or section where information not present may be worthy of inclusion
{{Self-published|Source}}

Edit
Talk
Links

On an article where a self-published (online or in print) source is cited, and is therefore not legitimately citable as a secondary source, according to policy.
{{Contradict-section}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Section which contains conflicting information
{{Incoherent}}

Edit
Talk
Links

It has been claimed that some or all of this section is incoherent and not understandable, and should possibly be reworded if the intended meaning can be determined.
See the talk page for details.
Section where some sentences in a section or the text as a whole does not relay an understandable message

[edit] For placement in or at top of a section

What to type What it makes Where it goes
{{Sectfact}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Disputed article sections
under section header
{{POV-section}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Disputed article sections
under section header
{{TotallyDisputed-section}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Disputed article sections
under section header
{{SectOR}}

Edit
Talk
Links

This section may contain original research or unverified claims.
Please help Wikipedia by adding references. See the talk page for details.
Section contains possible original research.
{{POV-intro}}

Edit
Talk
Links

The neutrality of this introduction is disputed.
Disputed article intro
top
{{Unverifiable-external-links}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Section contains links to unverifiable external sites.

[edit] For inline article placement

What to type What it makes Where it goes
{{fact}} or {{citation needed}}

Edit
Talk
Links

[citation needed]

After factual claims that need a citation to back them up.
in-line
{{Verify source}} or {{Check}}

Edit
Talk
Links

[verification needed]

After suspect citations or source references
in-line
{{Lopsided}}

Edit Talk
Links

[opinion needs balancing]

Lopsided
{{Verify credibility}}

Edit
Talk
Links

[this source's credibility needs verifying]

After suspect citations or source references
in-line
{{Dubious}}

Edit
Talk
Links

[dubious ]

Disputed statements
in-line
{{failed verification}}

Edit
Talk
Links

[not in citation given]

After factual claims that have been checked and not found in the indicated source. Explain in Talk.
in-line
{{or}}

Edit
Talk
Links

[original research?]

After text passages based upon original research
in-line
{{Nonspecific}} or {{Unverifiable}}

Edit
Talk
Links

[not specific enough to verify]

After factual claims that could be relevant, but are not cited and are too general for a {{fact}}.
in-line
{{Who}}

Edit
Talk
Links

[name a specific person/group]

After passages mentioning general groups (such as "many scientists") that could be made more specific by naming (and citing sources for) specific individuals.
in-line

[edit] For placement on talk pages of articles

What to type What it makes Where it goes
{{Calm talk}}

Edit
Talk
Links

This article is a frequent source of heated debate. Please try to keep a cool head when commenting here.
Talk pages which are likely to have incivil or hot-headed disputes.
{{ActiveDiscuss}}

Edit
Talk
Links

Accuracy dispute This article or section is currently being developed or reviewed.
Some statements may be disputed, incorrect, biased or otherwise objectionable.
Please read talk page discussion before making substantial changes.
Talk page or section
top
{{Controversial}}

Edit
Talk
Links

This is a controversial topic, which may be under dispute.
Please read this talk page and discuss substantial changes here before making them.
Make sure you supply full citations when adding information to highly controversial articles.
Talk page
top
{{Controversial3}}

Edit
Talk
Links

This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Should you wish to make any substantial changes or additions;
  • Before making any such substantial changes, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue.
  • During any such changes, please be careful to cite reputable sources supporting them, and when submitting your edit, please include an accurate and concise description in the "Edit summary" field-box.
  • After making any such changes, please also carefully describe the reason(s) for any such changes on the discussion-page.

(This message should only be placed on talk pages, please.)

Talk page
top

[edit] For placement on talk pages of users

see Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace