Talk:Temptation (game show)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag Temptation (game show) is part of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

This article is not assigned to a WikiProject or workgroup. Please help with your suggestions.

Wasn't it the case that Temptation was the original name of Sale of the Century? - Richardcavell 03:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

No. See Sale of the Century for the story. Lambertman 12:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Trivia

[edit] Fame Game wrong answer

From the Trivia section: On the November 1, 2005 episode of the show, Phillips began a Fame Game question, as per usual, with "Who am I?..." A contestant immediately buzzed in and answered "Ed Phillips". The contestant went on to lose the match by 5 dollars.

I might be wrong, but I thought that getting the Fame Game questions wrong (or correct) did not directly affect the score. --DavidMarsh 00:24, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

It doesn't, except for the $10/$15/$25 they could dget off the board. It's pretty much an anecdotal reference. Lambertman 00:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Harry and Lainie

I can't find any reference about an "off-stage" incident, but this article might be worth referencing: http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/enews/Nine_Network_-_Temptation_Gets_Nasty_181006.html I've seen a Herald Sun news article mentioned as well, but can't find it online. --DavidMarsh 07:35, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Looks like this bit has been removed (I agree with it's removal btw, as per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Remove_unsourced_or_poorly_sourced_controversial_material), but is it worth having a "controversies" section? A Current Affair has run a few stories on this, and even conducted a phone poll. Maybe it can be done without negativity to the people involved? Are there other incidents that have caused problems with the results (such as the audience yelling answers?) --DavidMarsh 11:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)