User talk:Tarikur
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Chittagong
The whole article has huge sections copied from Banglapedia article on Chittagong. So, please don't restore the copyvio text. Thank you. --Ragib 16:18, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Islam in the People's Republic of China
Re: your edit -- If you disagree with comments and warnings which other users placed on your talk page, it's better to provide a rebuttal rather than removing the warnings unilaterally. See Wikipedia:Talk pages#User talk pages.
Also, thank you for creating Islam in Taiwan. We should work together to figure out a way to work it into the Islam in Asia template since the political status of Taiwan is a sensitive matter. I notice also that you created Islam in the Republic of China by copying and pasting the content from Islam in Taiwan. If you think two pages should have the same content, it's easier and better to redirect rather than copy/paste. See Wikipedia:Redirect for more information. In the mean time, I've redirected Islam in the Republic of China to Islam in China, since the political entity Republic of China at one point controlled the whole territory of China. Tell me if you see a better solution to this problem. And please remember to cite sources. Thanks! cab 04:27, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
It seems to me that you are acting in an uncivil manner on Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigate edit wars. Intangible 20:11, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Please read WP:BLP. If you want to add criticism of AHA, find a person who actually has written about this in a reliable source or so. It is not enough that you think this is controversial, other (notable) people will have to have written about this before this can be entered into Wikipedia. Intangible 00:33, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not add unreferenced negative information to biographies of living persons, as you did to Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Thank you. Nothing in that documentary that talks about a supposed "apostate controversy." Intangible 04:03, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Three revert rule
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Robert Spencer. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. The JPStalk to me 10:57, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
