User talk:Talkstosocks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Request for edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

– Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:09, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cloyster GA

Hey TTS, I noticed you may be thinking about improving Cloyster to GA standards, I just thought you may want to look over thePokémon style guide, which has some information on pluralization and intros. Cheers, Highway Return to Oz... 17:53, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mirko Norac

Hi there. Thanks for your constructive criticism of the article I nominated for GA a month ago. I did my best to fix all of the issues you raised. Could you, please, take another look at the article and see if it is, in your oppinion, fit for GA status or it needs more work? --Dijxtra 12:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Price Is Right (US)

Thanks for your comments on the good article nomination. Very helpful information. —Twigboy 17:13, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cleanup Taskforce

You're listed in the cleanup taskforce but your desk doesn't seem to be setup correctly. Would you like assistance? RJFJR 17:44, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The dates on the 9th Century article

Please check Wikipedia style guide WP:DATES, Talktosocks. Either the AD/BC or CE/BCE use is acceptable, but the first editor of this article used AD. You may use the page history tab to see for yourself. JBogdan 19:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mirko Norac

Thanks for your interest in your role played with the Mirko Norac article. I was in the process of reading the Afd about it and was in the middle of leaving a reply that I thought it should be kept but edited, made neutral or etc in the case that it wasn't neutral. Right as I tried to leave my reply I saw that Adam Bishop had deleted it I think on the grounds for being bad faith. I hope you don't mind but I undeleted the article and did my best to edit it and make it neutral

Personally, I'd had no knowledge of Mirko Norac and am neutral as far as to whatever his or his followers or dejectors have to say about him. But in all due respect I hate seeing one's ideas censored. I think we should encourage others to make Wikipedia the best we can. If what I've submitted is neutral, I hope that not anyone else reverts it to an unneutral article.

Thanks again and feel free to check out my work on the public access television article where I make numerous contributions. DavidWJohnson 18:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Story

Hi. Could you please direct me to the specific Wikipedia style policies and/or guidelines you based this template on, so I can respond to it appropriately? Best, Dan —DCGeist 00:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../t/a/l/User_talk%7ETalkstosocks_18f5.html"