Talk:Takeshima Islands

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on July 23, 2006. The result of the discussion was redirect.

[edit] Why can User:Zonath erase all sentences with no explanations?

• Why can User:Zonath erase all the articles of Takeshima Islands with no explanations and redirect to that one-sided Dokdo page in qustion?

--⇒Shougiku Wine 15:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

• User:Zonath, why can't you recognize that the articles of Takeshima Islands are completely different from the too-self-satisfied Koreans' articles of Dokdo?

--⇒Shougiku Wine 15:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

• User:Zonath,why can't you see the one-sided-unfair articles of Dokdo having problems now?

--⇒Shougiku Wine 15:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Don't redirect this page to one-sided-unfair page "Dokdo"

Don' redirect this page "Takeshima Island" to one-sided-unfair page "Dokdo". See the discussion page of "Takeshima Islands" and "Dokdo" and answer (for User:Zonath). --⇒Shougiku Wine 16:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Nihonjoe, Please answer the questions!

• First Alert: Don' redirect this page "Takeshima Islands" to one-sided-unfair page "Dokdo".

--⇒Shougiku Wine21:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Do you see me redirecting it? Didn't think so. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 15:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• Second Alert: See the discussion page of "Takeshima Islands" and "Dokdo" and answer (for User:Zonath).

--⇒Shougiku Wine21:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

I've seen the page, and it's not worth posting a reply to your POV rantings. You;re so blinded by your own POV that you can't see the fact that there are a small number of editors trying to work out a NPOV that is fair to both (all?) sides in this dispute. People acting the way you're acting are only causing difficulties toward this end. If you don't like the neutral stance of Wikipedia, you are encouraged to go make your own POV wiki somewhere else. You have to maintain a neutral POV when editing articles here. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 15:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• Third Alert:Why do Koreans e.g.User:Nihonjoe wanna to redirect to one-sided-unfair page "Dokdo"? You haven't answer anything yet. It's like putting the cart before the horse. It's clear that Koreans e.g.User:Zonath), User:Nihonjoe and so on are cunning vandalists.

--⇒Shougiku Wine21:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

No, I'm more of a cunning linguist. (^_-). "Dokdo" is the title that was decided upon after a very lengthy discussion on the associated Talk pages. It only makes sense since South Korean is currently in political, economic, and physical control of the islets. Besides, it doesn't really matter what the title of the article is if all of the sides in the dispute are represented by the text of the article. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 15:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• Forth Alert: Why do not Koreans like User:Zonath), User:Nihonjoe and so on answer the questions?

--⇒Shougiku Wine21:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps because your questions are so absurd as to not generally be worth an answer? You aren't even remotely attempting to find neutral ground here. You even make accusations that you can't back up. As I've already told you, I'm about as Korean as Tony Blair. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 15:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• Fifth Alert: Why do Koreans like User:Zonath), User:Nihonjoe and so on ignore objective discussion?

--⇒Shougiku Wine21:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

This is too rich. You're so blinded by your own POV that anyone who is actually working toward a neutral POV is seen as unobjective by you. Please grow up and learn to act like an adult. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 15:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)