User talk:T.P.W.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Contributions
[edit] Debates
[edit] Projects
[edit] Suggestions
[edit] Comments
[edit] One of your comments has gone astray
See Talk talk:Misconceptions about the Shi'a. You might want to place that on the correct talk page. Choess 18:31, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Salam
You are right brother. I am fallible, and after being more or less alone as continualy active Shi'a wikipedian, and seeing what i see, and feeling no support from our Sunni brothers when i am being treaded unfairly, only since they rather not see the Shi'a view represented... Well, it was more than i could bare after a few years.
Inshalla i will learn to be like those i admire, instead of loosing temper as i do from time to time.
If you want a example, try to read this Talk:Sahaba.
You left your message to me on my Userpage, the custom is to leave it on the talk page: User_talk:Striver.
You can e-mail me here: [1]. Give me a notification on my talk page if you e-mail me, i dont chek it as often as i check my talk page.
Ma salam, and thanks for your support and reminders. I needed them. --Striver 00:57, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The High
The High is not the best English. It has a slang meaning, being intoxicated. The Exalted is much more suitable as a divine epithet. Zora 09:36, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Salam
Brother, im not going to accept the adminship, i have lost my temper a few times, and that isn't good...
Since you are relativly new, take a look att this:
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Islam:The_Muslim_Guild/User_comments/Zora
--Striver 11:02, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Haydar
As i said, welcome to Zora land... --Striver 13:29, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nishan-e-Haydar
Of course with out any doubt Nishan-e-Hayder is assiociated with Imam Ali. The word 'Hayder' is one of the name of Imam Ali. His mother Fatima binte Asad named him Hayder which means Lion.
I am Pakistani National and you can ask any Muslim (Shia/Sunni) group for confirmation.
View the following links:
http://www.pafcombat.com/misc/gallantry-awards.htm
http://www.geocities.com/salman4paf/Operational_Awards.html
Zaidi 17:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Shukran
Thanx for the Zulfaqar award! Im still pissed with the Samarra disaster. Those bastards.--Zereshk 02:55, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] "129."
Editing with a username which tries to look like an IP number seems kind of deceptive to me... AnonMoos 01:09, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- I edited your User:129. talk page because I didn't seem to be getting your attention here. Furthermore, "AnonMoos" as a username cannot be fairly accused of being an attempt to confuse technically unsophisticated users, while "129." could be. More importantly, if you want to be known as TPW instead of "129." in page edit histories (something which I would most definitely advise), then first LOG OUT OF WIKIPEDIA, and then log back in as "TPW". By the way, my motto of peace is المتبرجة خير من الإرهابي المنتحر AnonMoos 17:04, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- Sorry if I was a little too harsh, but "Salafi" is a highly sensitive article which has a long history of anonymous IP's trying to unilaterally hijack the article, and you didn't really follow the protocol there. I've added a comment to the top of the Talk:Salafi page to further clarify the "Controversial" template that was previously there, and in order to make it as clear as can be the policy which basically already existed before -- namely, that major edits to that article by anonymous IP editors which have not been previously discussed on the talk page, and which are not obvious prima facie improvments, stand an extremely high likelihood of being reverted.
-
- Since your editing alias "129." seemed to be chosen with deliberate intent to decieve and/or confuse, therefore I gave your edits an even higher degree of scrutiny than an ordinary garden-variety anonymous-IP editor would have received. Furthermore, my somewhat grumpy mood was not improved when I arrived at User:TPW (after a series of redirects) to discover that your idea of "worshipping peace" is to launch an anti-Zionist jihad.
-
- From the technical point of view, if you have no way of ever logging in to account User:TPW, then I'm afraid that you're simply NOT User TPW by any ascertainable criterion!!! Since there are objections to the username "129.", therefore PLEASE choose a different username, such as maybe User:TWP (for "The worshipper of peace"), User:T-P-W , etc. etc., and be logged into that name INSTEAD of being logged in as "129.". I'm sure this will make things easier for people dealing with your edits, which in turn will make things easier for you. It's a win-win situation all around.
-
- As for my motto, if you think mutabarrija means "porno actress", then I think you need to consult a dictionary. What mutabarrijah really means in most cases is "Muslimah who goes one tiny step beyond what a Friday preacher or moralistic writer thinks is allowable in dress or adornment". I'm not a Catholic, but I once was present in a Catholic church when a priest gave a sermon reminiscing about how in the 1950's or early 1960's or so, priests frequently gave sermons denouncing women for insufficently covering their hair in church, or for wearing insufficently serious garments, and saying how happy he was that priests no longer wasted their time in such a cause (while still reserving the right to condemn active immorality, of course). Too bad that most Muslim religious figures haven't yet learned what that priest knew over 30 years ago. Ever since Qaradawi gave his pronouncement that the only time a woman is allowed to go unveiled in public is in order to commit suicide terrorism atacks [2] , my motto of peace has been المتبرجة خير من الإرهابي المنتحر , and I'm very suspicious of the "peaceful" credentials of anyone who doesn't agree with that motto!
[edit] Haydar
Bro, if you dont agree with Haydar being a disambig, the revert it to a real article. If you like it as it is, then sorry for bothering. peace. --Striver 11:34, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Translation request
Hello, I saw that you are a native speaker of Arabic, so I would like to ask you if you could take a look at 2003 invasion of Iraq and Iraq War. There is a featured article in Arabic which we would like to know how it could be used the English one which is of course dominated by people who have either been there as soldiers or have their knowledge from western media. Someone also asked if the section about "related propaganda and phrases" could be amplified with information about the Iraqi side. Maybe there are also people who took photos in Iraq at the Arabic version? Nameme 16:17, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Qubbat-esSakhrah.jpg
 |
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Qubbat-esSakhrah.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 04:17, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Wikiethics
Hi,
We started a proposal Wikipedia:Wikiethics to state the existing policies coherently and make suggestions on improving the editorial standards in Wiki. I thought you might be interested in contributing to that proposal.
Unfortunately, a pro-porn and pro-offense lobby is trying to make this proposal a failure. They unilaterally started an approval poll although almost no one including me believe that it is time for a vote, simply because the policy is not ready. It is not even written completely.
Editors who thinks that the policy needs to be improved rather than killed by an unfair poll at the beginning of the proposal, started another poll ('Do we really need a poll at this stage?') at the same time. The poll is vandalized for a while but it is stable now. A NO vote on this ('Do we really need a poll now?') poll will strengthen the position of the editors who are willing to improve the ethics policy further.
If you have concerns about the ethics and editorial standards in Wiki, please visit the page Wikipedia:Wikiethics with your suggestions on the policy. We have two subpages: Arguments and Sections. You might want to consider reviewing these pages as well...
Thanks in advance. Resid Gulerdem 21:20, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Shia.PNG
The description on the image page had a fair number of problems; I edited it significantly... AnonMoos 23:17, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hello
7adertak Shi3e? Jaber90 23:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
