Symplectic matrix

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In mathematics, a symplectic matrix is a 2n×2n matrix M (whose entries are typically either real or complex) satisfying the condition

MTΩM = Ω.

where MT denotes the transpose of M and Ω is the 2n×2n skew-symmetric matrix

\Omega = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & I_n \\ -I_n & 0 \\ \end{bmatrix}

Here In is the n×n identity matrix. Note that Ω has determinant +1 and squares to minus the identity: Ω2 = −I2n.

N.B. Some authors prefer to use a different Ω for the definition of symplectic matrices. The only essential property is that Ω be a nonsingular, skew-symmetric matrix. The most common alternative is the block diagonal form

\Omega = \begin{bmatrix} \begin{matrix}0 & 1\\ -1 & 0\end{matrix} & & 0 \\  & \ddots & \\ 0 & & \begin{matrix}0 & 1 \\ -1 & 0\end{matrix} \end{bmatrix}

Note that this differs from the previous choice by a permutation of basis vectors. In fact, any choice of Ω can be brought to either of the above forms by a different choice of basis. See the abstract formulation below in the section on symplectic transformations.

Sometimes, the notation J is used instead of Ω for the skew-symmetric matrix. This is a particularly unfortunate choice as it leads to confusion with a linear complex structure, as described below.

Contents

[edit] Properties

Every symplectic matrix is invertible with the inverse matrix given by

M − 1 = Ω − 1MTΩ

Furthermore, the product of two symplectic matrices is, again, a symplectic matrix. This gives the set of all symplectic matrices the structure of a group. There exists a natural manifold structure on this group which makes it into a (real or complex) Lie group called the symplectic group. The symplectic group has dimension n(2n + 1).

It follows easily from the definition that the determinant of any symplectic matrix is ±1. Actually, it turns out that the determinant is always +1. One way to see this is through the use of the Pfaffian and the identity

Pf(MTΩM) = det(M)Pf(Ω).

Since MTΩM = Ω and \mbox{Pf}(\Omega) \neq 0 we have that det(M) = 1.

Let M be a 2n×2n block matrix given by

M = \begin{pmatrix}A & B \\ C & D\end{pmatrix}

where A, B, C, D are n×n matrices. Then the condition for M to be symplectic is equivalent to the conditions

ATDCTB = 1
ATC = CTA
DTB = BTD.

When n = 1 these conditions reduce to the single condition det(M) = 1. Thus a 2×2 matrix is symplectic iff it has unit determinant.

[edit] Symplectic transformations

In the abstract formulation of linear algebra, matrices are replaced with linear transformations of finite-dimensional vector spaces. The abstract analog of a symplectic matrix is a symplectic transformation of a symplectic vector space. Briefly, a symplectic vector space is a 2n-dimensional vector space V equipped with a nondegenerate, skew-symmetric bilinear form ω.

A symplectic transformation is then a linear transformation L : VV which preserves ω, i.e.

ω(Lu,Lv) = ω(u,v).

Fixing a basis for V, ω can be written as a matrix Ω and L as a matrix M. The condition that L be a symplectic transformation is precisely the condition that M be a symplectic matrix:

MTΩM = Ω.

Under a change of basis, represented by a matrix A, we have

\Omega \mapsto A^T \Omega A
M \mapsto A^{-1} M A.

One can always bring Ω to either of the standard forms given in the introduction by a suitable choice of A.

[edit] Notation: J vs. Ω

Sometimes, the notation J is used instead of Ω for the skew-symmetric matrix. This is a particularly unfortunate choice as it leads to confusion with a linear complex structure, which often has the same coordinate expression but represents a very different structure. These are two different things and should be distinguished. In particular, one could easily choose a basis for which Ω2 ≠ −1, whereas this is an essential quality of a complex structure. Moreover, J should be understood as a linear transformation whereas Ω is a bilinear form.

Given a hermitian structure on a vector space, J and Ω are related via

\Omega_{ab} = g_{ac}{J^c}_b

where gac is the metric. That J and Ω can sometimes have the same coordinate expression (up to an overall sign) is simply a consequence of the fact that the metric g is often the identity matrix.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

In other languages