Talk:Suprnova.org
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article has been improved by the Cleanup Taskforce to conform with a higher standard of quality. Please see its Cleanup Taskforce page for more details on this process, and possible ideas on how you can further improve this article! |
Contents |
[edit] NewNova.org
Anyone know whats happened with this site ?
Last time I checked they turned it into a private tracker that charges to get bootlegged materials. What a joke!--146.235.66.52 19:56, 9 November 2006 (UTC)RadChaolan
[edit] tone in last paragraph
I think the last paragraph regarding the .com and .net sites could stand to be reworded. Luke 23:40, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC) Done.--207.148.148.163 02:12, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Supr is dead! =
Greetings everybody, As you have probably noticed, we have often had downtimes. This was because it was so hard to keep this site up! But now we are sorry to inform you all, that SuprNova is closing down for good in the way that we all know it. We do not know if SuprNova is going to return, but it is certainly not going to be hosting any more torrent links. We are very sorry for this, but there was no other way, we have tried everything. Thank you all that helped us, by donating mirrors or something else, by uploading and seeding files, by helping people out on IRC and on forum, by spreading the word about SuprNova.org. It is a sad day for all of us! Please visit SuprNova.org every once in a while to get the latest news on what is happening and if there is anything new to report on. As we wish to maintain the nice comunity that we created, we are keppig forums and irc servers open. Thank you all and Goodbye! sloncek & the rest of the SuprNova Team
[edit] from Vfd
On 20 Feb 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Suprnova.org for a record of the discussion.
[edit] Closure FAQ.
The orginal page is 404 compliant, so I made it an archive.org link. The FAQ was removed by the time archive.org got to it. -- Derfy 18:37, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Basic writing rules
"Later, Sloncek revealed ..." Slon-who ? New words/names should be introduced/explained first, and used aftewards. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.253.102.145 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Factual accuracy problem
Unless someone can cite caselaw backing up
- These torrent files that point to copyright protected works are illegal in several countries, including the United States
I think we ought to politely reword it to make clear that that's wishful thinking on the part of the Associations. I'm all about allowing artists to make money off their work, but the rules are, in fact, the rules, and playing into the hands of those who want to make them unworkably tight by implying that they already are isn't especially useful. --Baylink 00:39, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- AFAIK, the DMCA and similar laws (I believe Australia is getting similar laws thanks to their FTA with the US and I know the EU were considering a DMCA like law) makes it so. Actually this might be a bit misleading, it's not your responsibility to censor you content. However you are required to take down the link when you receive a valid DMCA notice. I'm not particularly clear on the law but certain torrent sites do comply with the DMCA and take down the content, when served with a valid notice. Nil Einne 00:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Deleted revisions
Hi, just to let everyone know and clear up any possible confusion that might arise due to this, I deleted two revisions of this page where User:2fktup inserted Slonček's address into the article. These were located between this and this revision, and included one by User:203.173.136.249 on 13:18, 3 November 2006, which now appears to have been made by me (in reality, what I actually did was remove the address prior to deleting the offending revisions). -- Schnee (cheeks clone) 21:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
