Talk:SunnyD
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Re-launch?
Anyone know why Sunny Delight was re-launched in 2002?
• Thorpe • 09:55, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move, counting Boffy's proposal as a support. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 19:02, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
- Sunny Delight → SunnyD … Rationale: SunnyD has been the official name for some time, but is currently a redirect to Sunny Delight. boffy_b 20:21, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Oppose Best known as "Sunny Delight" and still made by "Sunny Delight Beverages Co." --Henrygb 21:59, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Support - I see no reason not to use the official name here, as it's not like "SunnyD" is an obscure term for it. — sjorford (talk) 10:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
I found it confusing to refer to the product as SunnyD and the company as Sunny Delight, so I changed references to the company to SDBC. I'm not sure this is the best solution, but couldn't think of a better one. boffy_b 09:30, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Copyright?
Parts of this article seem to have been copied word for word from this article which ironically is cited on the page itself. Wouldn't this be a case of copyright infringement? -HumanZoom 09:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Five Percent?
The reference to 5% fruit juice at the end of the advertising section seems misplaced.