Talk:Sum of squares
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article should be merged with some others, but least squares is not the right one. Michael Hardy 23:51, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
I agree; Least squares is about so much more.
How about merging Sum of squares into Variance?
Reasons: The Sum of squares article is a lot like Variance, but makes a few good points which Variance could make better:
- Sum of squares gives a more patient explanation of where the term Deviation comes from.
- Sum of squares explains in more depth that the reason for dividing the sum of squares by n or n-1 is to keep the variance from growing linearly as more samples are gathered.
JEBrown87544 17:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
No, not variance. Least squares is NOT about "so much more". A whole book can be written on "sum of squares", and was--a fairly long one, by Henry Scheffe. If it's to be merged into something, maybe it should be analysis of variance. I'll be back to add some material.... Michael Hardy 21:16, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- You don't believe that Sum of squares overlaps with the Least squares and regression analysis section of Least squares?
- In my experience, when people use the term "sums of squares", they use it in reference to ANOVA or fitting a regression model using the Least squares method—instead, they use terms like "random variable", "standard deviation", "variance", or "range" when talking about variation.
- Personally, I'd expect an article on sums of squares to discuss the following instead of variance:
-
- Sums of squares due to regression
- Sums of squares due to error
- Total sum of squares
- Sums of squares due to a given ANOVA factor
- The relationship between the above and ANOVA and regression models
-
- How about this as a counter-proposal?:
-
- Merge the current content of Sum of squares into Variance
- Rewrite Sum of squares to discuss the role of sums of squares in ANOVA and in the least squares method of fitting regression models
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- --DanielPenfield 21:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I don't think this should get merged with least squares. The least squares article could reasonably neglect some topics that belong here: how to partition the sum of squares in complicated experimental designs. Michael Hardy 17:49, 3 October 2006 (UTC)