Talk:Sultana (steamboat)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vernet's Shipwreck This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, an attempt to improve coverage of shipwreck-related topics. See also the parent WikiProject, WikiProject Disaster Management. If you plan to work on this article for an extended period of time, please indicate what you are doing on the Project's talk page.
NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritising and managing its workload.
B This article has been rated as b-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the Project's importance scale.

An event in this article is a April 27 selected anniversary (may be in HTML commment)


This seems to be two articles put together - perhaps the first part could be reduced to a brief summary with the second as is. Leonard G. 00:36, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)


The latter half seems to be fairly colourful writing, not quite what you see in other Wikipedia articles.

Actually, it feels to me (obviously I don't know for certain) like it was just pulled from somewhere else.


I have removed the second part since it was very long and did indeed seem to be taken from a book. I didn't think the style was appropriate for an encyclopedia anyway. I left the first part intact as it is more of a concise summary of the event. L. Pistachio 20:59, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)


I added a section on the cause; a more detailed explanation of the boiler failure theory and the theory that the disaster was due to sabotage. I know this is controversial to some people but I believe the Rule's article in North and South magazine and their web site (cited as sources) makes a good case that the sabotage theory is at least plausible. I am personally an advocate for the sabotage theory as I have a personal connection to the coal torpedo which was claimed to be the sabotage device. I believe I have stated the case neutrally or even understated the case for sabotage, and with great respect for the official explanation.Thatcher131 16:11, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3

no acually this was very nice even the lastb bpart