Talk:Sugarcult
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Someone needs to remove them from "Canadian Musical Groups" because these guys are from California.
Contents |
[edit] vandalism
someone vandalised this group being unregistered and unknowing, i don't know how to correct this
the album lists were delted and replaced by "poop"
Sugarcult is just a synonym for rusty trombone.
also anything these jerks made is poop... get over it.
[edit] Genre
I understand that genres are often subjective put surely these are classic power-pop? Pop punk brings to mind bands more like the buzzcocks, ramones etc. I propose at least adding power-pop for clarity and a more accurate definition if no-one objects.
i object! they have less of a pop sound than most powerpop bands. plus id say theyre less mainstream than powerpop bands like hellogoodbye so i think we should take it off. pop punk fits them more in my opinion. Burger king 20:07, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
i disagree, power-pop bands, at least, at this point in time arent often very mainstream. They certainly arent pop punk, i dont think there is any such genre these days, they dont have anything it common with the buzzcocks, undertones, ramones or the clash that i can see. They are far more like power-pop bands like fountains of wayne and blink 182 etc. They fit in the genre perfectly. Pop punk is definetly extremely misleading. it suggests part of the seventies movement. I dont see why power-pop, which i'm sure most people would agree is a better description of their style, shouldnt be included.
i guess so. but what pop punk refers to now is different than the classic punk that is called pop punk. and powerpop just makes them sound more soft or something. i dont know... i guess youre right. whateverBurger king 04:00, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Album Leak
Is the leaking of the album really noteworthy?
[edit] Band Member Pages?
Are the separate pages for the band members really necessary? The one for Marko 72 only has a couple sentences.
