Talk:Stryker (disc jockey)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

[edit] No more opinions

People are entitled to their opinions, but this is no place for them. There is to be no rumors, no unsourced remarks, and no irrelevant weasle attempts to put libelous material. If you can't back it up, then shut up and don't make edits.

waesle attempts, like not signing your name on the talk page? -- Craigtalbert 00:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

The line "It is common belief among a number of Loveline fans that Stryker is "worse than AIDS" is opinion (an immature one at that). It's a message you posted on the Loveline Companion then used that as your reference. Stop editing already and grow up GiantRobot 14:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

I would like to point out to editors that the repeated insertion of unsourced or poorly sourced negative information into the biography of a living person is a serious violation of WP:BLP, and is a blockable offence. Editors should remove any such information immediately and with extreme prejudice, and such removals are an exception to the 3RR rule. - Crockspot 21:58, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

At the very least can there be a part in the article stating how disliked he is or how much contempt there is for him among Loveline fans?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.215.236.242 (talk • contribs).

If it is solidly supported by a reliable secondary source, such as a newspaper article, yes. If it is original research, or is supported by a blog post, which is not a reliable source, then no. I would recommend looking at the following articles carefully before proceeding: WP:BLP, WP:RS, WP:ATT, WP:OR, WP:NPOV. - Crockspot 16:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC) Additional comment, I also noticed that you redirected Retarded to this article. That is considered vandalism, AND defamatory. - Crockspot 16:43, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DOB

According to IMDB, Stryker was born June 4th 1977 (where as the page says 1972). -- Craigtalbert 00:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

the June 4, 1972 birthday is present on the Westwood One offical website. Now here's the tricky part: It looks like whoever posted Styker's profile to Westwood One copied this page! Maybe it was even Styker himself, in which case that would confirm the veracity of the information that was copied. --Legitimus 14:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC).

How can you tell if the westwood one profile was copied here or vice versa? -- Craigtalbert 02:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

I am the original creater of this article, and wrote it in my own words as best I could (I've very green to using and contributing to wikipedia, so I've been learning rules and etiquette as a I go. It's complicated!) Anyhow, the westwood one piece was practically word for word for the version at that time, though it's hard to pinpoint exactly when that was. I was very surprised, since I thought they'd write something more original. I think a careful scrutiny of the edit history will support this. Legitimus 23:04, 8 December 2006 (UTC)