Talk:Structured cabling
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As there is no indication as to what sections of the article fail to represent a Worldwide View, I'm deleting the notice. If you feel differently, please re-add it, and make some notation on the talk page Zero sharp 00:12, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- I've popped it back in. I can see two problems - (a) use of PABX without refernce to the alternative PBX, and (b) the assumption that voice reqiuuires a BT adapter - true in the UK, Hong Kong and NZ perhaps, but probably not eleswhere --Snori 02:45, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know what you mean about PABXs; from what I've read in the PBX article, PABX is not a regional- or country-specific term. I do see your point about the BT adapter; in the U.S. no adapter is needed, since you can plug a standard telephone cable (crimped with an RJ11 jack on the end) into an RJ45 socket. In many new installations these days installers will use one type wall socket plate, with RJ45 compatible sockets. The only difference between voice and data sockets (from the user's point of view) would be some sort of color coding scheme and/or an icon or a label on the plate itself. — EagleOne\Talk 03:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)