User talk:Steveng75
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Regarding edits made during October 19, 2006
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Alex Bakharev 04:45, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- There's obviously no point running through the warnings in your case. You have been blocked for 48 hours. Hesperian 04:50, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding edits made during October 31, 2006
I've already reverted your insertion into the George W. Bush article because they inject a POV statement which is a violation wiki's stance regarding NPOV's. I suggest you don't do it again. Also the fact you used the same tactic to inserting sneak vandalism by editing twice to show if there was probably no change. I've already reported you to Hesperian. ViriiK 22:24, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
You might want to expand CallMe's Wiki article, before someone flags it as a stub and it is removed. Ardo 03:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] W Marsh
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Anthony.bradbury 01:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Kds logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kds logo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Using infoboxes @ King David School, Melbourne
Hi Steven: Thanks for your work at King David School, Melbourne. No need to "reinvent the wheel" with infoboxes. Take a look at Category:Education infobox templates and see the Template:Infobox Private School (which I have already applied.) Best wishes, IZAK 10:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] CallMe Communications
Steven, you must read and understand standards for inclusion of articles on companies and our autobiography guidelines; it is extremely difficult to write a neutral article on your own company, which is why we prefer that someone independent of the company do so. All of your versions so far have looked substantially like ad copy. At this point I have protected the page location to prevent recreation; if you or someone else would like to post something that conforms to our policies, let us know on the talk page. -- nae'blis 00:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding edits made during November 29, 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Kchase T 00:35, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] George W. Bush Vandelism
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to George W. Bush, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Iriseyes 03:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] What are you here?
You've been here a while now, and it seems you only ever contribute advertising and vandalism. Do you intend to contribute useful material at any point? Hesperian 05:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding changes made to a closed discussion page
Please do not change discussion pages that are closed for archiving. I have reverted your changes done to article deletion discussions for CallMe Communications. Should you wish to discuss your matter further you can raise it in an appropriate discussion, i.e. deletion review. Read the instructions at the top of the discussion page in question for further information. --DryBitterMelon 05:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
