User talk:SteveLamacq43
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Regarding The Undertaker
Experimenting? I have been doing this for quite sometime, thank you! You know, I really don't care for the Mark Calaway article, but if you want to immerse the article in the excrement of your own idiocy, fine. The man was born in 1962, like it or not. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thegoodson (talk • contribs) .
Okay, I apologize for being rude, but some of the edits are just so off on the article, not to mention the rest of wikipedia. People just don't trust the info. Mark Calaway was NOT born in 1960. He was born in 1962. I watched the WWE(back when it was WWF) for over 16 years. The Undertaker, along with Bret Hart, were my favorite wrestlers. I know exactly when the Undertaker was born and every source claims 1962. Why is everyone changing it? First they had 1965 and I corrected it. Then they came up with 1964, and again I corrected. Then now, 1960? It was 1962! Some sources for that:
Why is it that on wikipedia he has to have like 3 different birthdates? User:TheGoodSon
You know, I really don't care. The man was born in 1962...I was a huge fan of the Undertaker! So you don't know where 1960 and 1965 (yes, that was there too) came from, yet you are quick to downplay several other sources that all claim 1962. It says a lot more than just opinions of various users. Man I wish I had those magazines I used to, or I wish the WWE still had the birthdates of the wrestlers on the bios at their site. Too bad... User:TheGoodSon
[edit] AfD nomination on LGBT Simpsons Characters
It's probably just a case of copying and pasting a bit too much, but there's no need to add the "See also" links to the top of the page linking to the AfD template and so on. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:36, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Another Move
I noticed your comments on the Wrestling Wikiproject talk page about moving pages. Since you agree with me that moves should be done, come support the request to move Glen Jacobs to Kane (wrestler). You can do so here. Thanks. -- Mikedk9109 (talk) 01:13, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User:Mines45
You said: "I hope it's alright posting this; I wasn't sure whether it'd fit on any of the noticeboards. Could you do something about User:Mines45 please? He adds incorrect information to articles, and has removed the warnings from his talk page to stop. He then posted this on my talk page, which, according to my Googling [1], is quite offensive."
- This user has been blocked for a month. He was previously blocked for one week for similar behaviour and his continued blanking of his discussion page showed bad faith. --Yamla 15:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Thanks a lot. Cheers, SteveLamacq43 17:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Kerry King
Sorry if this is the wrong place, but i recently saw that you added some tags to the Kerry King article. I was hoping you could tell me on how to improve it a bit, like what to add and improve on, also perhaps enter the [citation needed] tag where a source is required so the article can be rid of the tag, Thanks M3tal H3ad 13:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Daniel Craig
Daniel Craig article- please do not delete the information about him going to Hilbre High as it is true. He also played for Hoylake Rugby club which you appear to have deleted. Have a nice day. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.229.27.251 (talk) 13:17, 19 November 2006
[edit] Sorry
Sorry about reverting your edit in Glen Jacobs. I think we saw the same vandalism, but you reverted and saved just before I went to revert it. In the process I accidentally reverted you. My bad, -- THLCCD 16:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] You lost yer ollies or wha?
moggy & sin shifter ain't scouse? Prithy, do tell from whence they doth emanate:) Cheers, Vera, Chuck & Dave 17:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Well, my grandad used "sin shifter" to refer to the chaplain they used to go to in WW1, and he was Irish. As for moggy, no etymology lists it as Scouse, and between the 80 years of me and my dad's Scouse living, neither of us have heard it regarded as such. You also provided no reference to the contrary so... SteveLamacq43 18:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- LOL! Yeah, could well be Irish - Ok, you can have those la! Best wishes, Vera, Chuck & Dave 18:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] For you
 |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For your reverting of vandalism on wrestling articles, to make sure they are vandalism-free. Thanks. -- Mikedk9109 (hit me up) 23:26, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] Image question
You said: "Dear Yamla, I had planned on downloading this image, and editing it to remove red eye, bluriness etc. however, as it's released under the Creative Commons licence, I'm not sure if I could then upload the edited version as I could with a public domain image. Even if I do give the intended attribution."
- Yeap, provided you still give credit to the original authors. See Creative Commons and Creative Commons licenses. The text of the particular license would be useful as well, of course, but the point of the cc attribution license is to "Permit others to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work and derivative works based upon it only if they give you credit." (emphasis mine). --Yamla 16:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- Great, thanks for your help! SteveLamacq43 16:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re:
I can get more than one barnstar, haha. I just think you deserved it because you are a truly good editor and I respect that.-- Mikedk9109 (hit me up) 21:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
