Talk:Stewart Grand Prix
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Stewart > Jaguar > Red Bull
I've obviously got different views to everyone else on this one.
I don't think it's necessary to trace the history of all of a team's descendants in the article for that team. I think it's entirely adequate to mention who bought the team - part of the charm of an encyclopedia is following those links through to the next stage. In this case there's not a great deal of similarity in the 'personality' or the histories of the three teams. Not only did they have different owners, different sponsors (HSBC excepted), different management and technical teams (several of each in the case of Jag :-)) and different drivers (Herbert excepted, and he didn't last long), but they have had very different levels of success in F1.
I suppose I can live with the brief mention that has been put in again as a point of interest - at least it's not a potted history of Jaguar and Red Bull, unlike the elements I've previously deleted. Am I the only one who feels like this? 4u1e 7 April 2006
[edit] Gary Anderson
Why is the name Gary Anderson linking to some American football player and even when you click disambiguation there is no mention of the former car designer.
-
- Fixed it, in a way. --Guroadrunner 04:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 1999 bolded
Why is it that the entry for 1999 is bolded whereas 1998 and 1997 are not? What do we want for the standard style? -- Guroadrunner 04:31, 25 September 2006 (UTC)