Talk:Stephanie Hoyland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There's no way this page should exist on its own, it should be merged with Carla Bonner, even though that page is pretty awful too. But that page is linked to from the Neighbours page, so it should stay, but possibly in a refined format. Budgiekiller 13:23, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

  • I agree, too bad I prefer working on more notable articles, though I often find myself cleaning up someone else's mess who haven't learnt how to edit Wikipedia properly yet. :P — Wackymacs 11:23, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Ha, snobbish wikifier! My personal favourite part of this page : "Everyone used to rave about my vegetarian nibblies and tuba solos." - someone help me! Budgiekiller 13:02, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
  • It's quite humorous, I personally think all the details in the Life section are irrelevant, so merging might be a few minute task, Who is really going to be looking at this article? (I only found it in the Wikify backlog, honest...) — Wackymacs 14:59, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Ahem, me too... and you'll never catch me watching Neighbours, ever. Honest... Budgiekiller 16:22, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
  • I disagree. Stephanie Hoyland has been played by two actors - not just Carla. It could, however, be safely merged into Neighbours 88.110.13.236 19:59, 24 December 2005 (UTC) (User:Oliverkeenan)

Contents

[edit] My Views on this

I'm dead sure the information is all from the BBC Neighbours website.

But more to the point, this topic shouldn't be merged with Carla Bonner. Other pages about the character an actor potrays aren't merged with the actor's page, so why should this one be? User:JD UK

[edit] Okay

Fine, the consensus says it should stay. I do wonder if anyone has actually read the article, however, since its content is decidedly non-encyclopedic. Regardless, I shall remove the Merge suggestion and leave the desperate page to its own devices! Budgiekiller 11:15, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More encyclopaedic?

I have made a rough edit, but it's hardly all that great, mainly because I did this without a draft, and I'm quite sleepy at the moment. If someone could edit it so it's more to Wikipedia's standards, that would be great. User:JD UK February 25 2006, 0630 GMT/UTC

  • It's amazing how people can keep marking this article, but nobody is bothering to actually edit it. If I did it, I would probably make it more of a mess, but I'll try later in the week. JD 02:48, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
  • I hope that's a bit better, but don't moan at me if it isn't. JD 19:40, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fixing of Article

I've managed to edit this article so it isn't as messy as before and doesn't look so much like a direct rip from the BBC character profile page with Harold's commentary. Conquistador2k6 12:42, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Not as though many people read this page anyway. JD 22:37, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Still, It's a little more acceptable and a tad cleaner now. It doesn't look so much like a poor patch job so it really doesn't need to be Wikified. Conquistador2k6 10:26, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

lmao thanks for that JD 11:11, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More information

Can anybody write up some information of before the motorbike accident? It looks a bit lame when you know that more stuff happened before that. --JD[don't talk|email] 08:42, 13 July 2006 (UTC)