Talk:Star Trek Customizable Card Game

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Star Trek Portal

This article is being improved by the Cleanup Taskforce to conform with a higher standard of article quality. It is likely to change frequently until completed. Please see its Cleanup Taskforce page for more details.

[edit] Opinion

This page contains quite a bit of opinion and some inaccurate information. I cleaned up parts of it, but it could still use some work. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FrakkinAnimal (talk • contribs) 02:21, 27 May 2006 (UTC).

I've added some more current (and much needed) information. When I get the chance, I'll move some other things around to achieve a more NPOV level. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.118.125.156 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 12 June 2006 (UTC).

Please remember to sign and date your contributions to talk pages. This can be done by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your text. This will let people coming into the article weeks, months, even years after you, whether your ideas and concerns are new or old, and whether they've been acted on already or not.

The current version of the article does have a problem with NPOV, but it's a relatively small problem. Opinion is okay; per WP:NPOV it is encyclopedic to present viewpoints in a neutral manner. The problem is the lack of attribution of viewpoints: Who questions the game's future? Who says Delta Quadrant Spatial Scission jumped the shark? Anyway, this problem likely follows from the article's much bigger problem: lack of references! Citing sources will go a long way toward clearing the POV attribution up. Matt Fitzpatrick 15:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comments

It is not clear how many players are supported in the game; though mention of '2 players games' are made repeatedly, it would be helpful to know how many people can play and how well e.g., MtG can be played with more than 2 players but it's not ideal.

It would be helpful in the list of expansions to mention the dates they were released.

Brief mention is made that some cards are 'backwards compatible' but this concept isn't well explained.

--UniqueCrash5 18:30, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

The game was designed to be both a 2-player and multi player game. Many of the cards have text such as "the player on your right may do X" to allow for multiple opponents. Initially, the tournament system recognised both formats, but it currently only sanctions regular tournaments where players face each other 1-on-1.

I made a few changed top the Enterprise Collection area to reflect the fact that this product is now being shipped and that players have already been receiving them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.18.160.11 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 5 July 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Need Help

This article needs to be edited by someone who has an expansive knowledge of the game. There is no way for me, or anyone who is unfamiliar with the game, to provide a comprehensive edit. I changed some things that were NPOV and tried to remove any language that sounded like it wasn't an encyclopedia article. I will post a verify for it and put it in article clean up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Plm209 (talk • contribs) 08:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC).

I'll take a look at it here over the next week, see if I can't do it some justice. (Played the game from shortly after release up until shortly before its demise and renaming as the First Edition, so I'll see what I can do) Kcbnac 18:18, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

I would be happy to add to the second edition page, which I feel is totally biased against the game. I will review it in time to add much needed information, and clear up the inaccuracies. Once a skeleton is in place, I can beef up the content. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.18.160.11 (talk • contribs) 03:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC).