From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is part of WikiProject Computer and video games, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. |
CVG To-do:
- Expand: New CVG Articles, List of Nintendo trademarks, Normality, Pac-Man World 2, Operation Flashpoint: Elite, Call of Juarez, Galactic Civilizations II: Dark Avatar, Ford Street Racing, Betrayal at Krondor
- CVG Peer Review: Super Transformation, Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer and video games, Yoshi, Turok: Dinosaur Hunter, Black Isle's Torn, Rise of Nations, Kirby (Nintendo), PlayStation 3, Mega Man Zero 4, Luigi
- Cleanup: Shiny Entertainment, Age of Mythology, Serious Sam II, Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, Ted Price, Betrayal at Krondor, Little Fighter 2
- Merge:
- Current Events (Update needed!) / Deletions / Essential articles / Workshop / Magazines
- Assess and Prioritise articles (Log)
|
I would buy one of the Sega/Genesis systems if they re-released that game, it was that good, IMO.
Just expanded the article greatly with considerable wikification and external links. I think this game is more historically important than Wikipedia has heretofore indicated (but maybe it's just that I liked it as a kid). Anyone have the resources to get a good screenshot we can use? --Matt McIrvin 13:08, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
"Surprisingly, Solaris on the Atari 2600 was more visually advanced than the original Atari 800 version of Star Raiders."
Is this an error? Why should it be surprising that a later game is more visually advanced than an earlier one? Trinite 21:08, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- It's surprising because the Atari 800 is a significantly more advanced system than the Atari 2600. Clayhalliwell 18:40, 3 July 2006 (UTC)