User talk:ST47/Archive7

[edit] anon

You just edited my addition to yhe article "Overweight". I will repost it, but don't reedit it. It wasn't experimental, it was intended.

[edit] List of characters from Family Guy

I just restored your revert of my 3 edits without the <<episode needed>> tags ... if you look at the difference, I think you will see that they were valid edits. I'll come back Some Other Day and stick {{fact}} templates instead. Fight creeping cruft! —141.156.240.102 (talk|contribs) 01:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

If you want to add that, you can, just put the hidden part inside <!-- here --> ST47Talk 01:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

What I really need is a Template for indicating, "When you add a character's appearance in a cameo, cutaway scene, or flashback, be sure to add a link to the specific episode." I'm just trying to make this (and similar articles) more encyclopedic than just, "In one episode, ..." If I can remember the episode, I add it, and in other cases, I enclose the episode name in double-quotes (or italics, if it's a movie or another TV show) and double square brackets so that it's linked.

By experimentation, I have discovered the ^{[episode needed]} tag, which will be Really Helpful ... had I known about it, I would have used it instead! —141.156.240.102 (talk|contribs) 01:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] mughal empire

hey,

yeah....it was not intended vandalism......I did not receive a digital manuscript for the text from my column writer, so I had to do it by hand and shorten it out, sorry about all the edits!!

prof Hughes

[edit] Sherlock Holmes

In this edit [1], you restored a piece of vandalism that had just been removed ! Shome mishtake shurely ? -- Beardo 02:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Homebake edit

I added Midget to the 1996 Sydney Homebake lineup and it was removed. Why? They did play - right before Something For Kate.

[edit] Joseph Smith: Prophet of the Restoration

What vandalism are you talking about? Here is the edits in question. All I did was remove the stub tags and fix those Categories: (1) The stub tags are not appropriate because the article it too long to be a stub; (2) Category:Presidents of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is for people, not films; (3) Category:History of the Latter Day Saint movement is for actual history, not depictions of history, and (4) Category:Joseph Smith, Jr. is a better category anyways, and it's a sub cat of Category:History of the Latter Day Saint movement anyways. If you disagree with my assessment, that's fine, it's your right, but don't label disagreements about content as vandalism (assume good faith), and defiantly do not give a incorrect Final warning; there are better ways to deal with conflicts than they way you are choosing. -- 12.106.111.10 21:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

I used a t4 on an ip with a t3, that's procedure. you removed two tags and two cats with no editsummary. ST47Talk 21:41, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Official Wikipedia policy is assume good faith, even for edits made by IP addresses with no edit summary. Vandalism is "any addition, deletion, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia." "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Apparent bad-faith edits that do not make their bad-faith nature inarguably explicit are not considered vandalism at Wikipedia." Please, next time look before you shoot. -- 12.106.111.10 23:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Erode

This ip address is that of a university hence even though I am not the person who made those edits, I can assure you that they were NOT vandalisms. The person who added them in all likelihood lived there and wished to add the name of a college which he knew existed yet was not listed. 203.197.196.1 01:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:193.180.104.200

Check out how many times you warned this guy here - sorry wish I'd seen sooner!  Glen  11:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

oh my! Thanks for blocking him :P! ST47Talk 11:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] spammer

My Additions concerning Seth Tinsley on the Lincoln Herndon Page are historically accurate. DO NOT CHANGE THEM unlee you have the evidence / research to do so.

I see - your linkspam is accurate? ST47Talk 19:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Please quit dinging my edits on the Lincoln-Herndon page. The Tinsley Dry Goods web page is part of the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency. Also, if you have a PHd in History or better ... tell me where from. Otherwise bugoff! George

I don't need a degree in history to read WP:SPAM, and I can read the big heading at the top of my talkpage. Try it someday, it might get a better response if I don't have to hunt in my history to figure out who you are ST47Talk 19:51, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

Have replied on my talk page. Arbitrary username 09:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Robot

Just occasionally, RobotG (talk • contribs) gets logged out and puts through the odd edit anonymously. Please let it pass. --RobertG ♬ talk 11:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

OK, wasn't sure when I saw the bot edits on VP - why dont you put a note on your IP's talk? ST47Talk 11:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] noob below this line

Look You piece, my edits were valid. You mess up everybody shit, mabye you should stop re-editing peoples things. You gay fuck.

[edit] Headline text

You Suck Stop editing my edits. You are a piece of crap and don't know how to use a computer. You fuck.

this one I had to respond to - I think he meant to put "you suck" as the section name ST47Talk 19:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ASS

You piece of fucking shit, your mother was a frisco dike. You fuck for dollars. Also your dad was a jiggalo. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 158.165.16.201 (talk • contribs) 20:16, 17 November 2006.

this user has been blocked for 24 hours ST47Talk 19:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Why? Seems innocent enough to me... haz (talk) e 19:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding my "nonsence" on the sandbox

HELLO! that is the SANDBOX, i was EXPERIMENTING

im angry now!82.44.252.243 19:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Well, it was a mistake, and you'll find you get much better responses from people when you don't come and SHOUT at THEM about YOUR edits ON the SANDBOX oK? ST47Talk 19:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

I was obviosly angry...--82.44.252.243 19:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

then calm down before you make someone else angry, like an admin who can block you ST47Talk 19:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm not that angry, sometimes people interprate capitals as extremely loud shouts by a person with mental issues, banging his fists around the table breaking a few stuff... I really should rethink how I express my anger to someone so that no one over-interprates it. --82.44.252.243 19:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] guy

Alisonheritage2291 12:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)I am on a no smoking program, but im allergic to the sticky on the back of patches. my legs are red raw and a burning feeling. i was given a barrier cream to put on, but it works for a while and then the symptomes come back. i have tried anti-histamins and they are not working for me.can you give me advice.

[edit] RfA Thanks

Thank you for the Support I'd like to express my huge thanks to you, ST47, for your support in my recent RfA, which closed with 100% support at 71/0/1. Needless to say, I am very suprised at the huge levels of support I've seen on my RfA, and at the fact that I only had give three answers, unlike many other nominees who have had many, many more questions! I'll be careful with my use of the tools, and invite you to tell me off if I do something wrong! Thanks, Martinp23 14:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for your support!

A week ago I nominated myself, hoping to be able to help Wikipedia as an administrator as much as a WikiGnome. I am very glad many others shared my thoughts, including you. Thank you for your trust! Be sure I will use these tools to protect and prevent and not to harass or punish. Should you feel I am overreacting, pat me so that I can correct myself. Thanks again! ReyBrujo 19:28, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] editing of page on "newsletter"

Hi,

Why did you remove the stuff I added the Newsletter? No offence, but just want to understand the reasons.

Stardancer

Hi! I've never edited Newsletter - are you sure it was me? ST47Talk 20:57, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

The edit is marked as STBot, and this bot refers to you. Please check. User:Stardancer

you mean this? That's just fixing a link that was messed up. ST47Talk 11:48, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, it looks like I've confused your edit with the next one from 212.219.118.2. I wonder who this guy is. Sorry about the confusion. Stardancer

heh - np ST47Talk 12:55, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

Do you want to be ma' friend if ya' do tell me

[edit] Regarding User: 167.206.78.2

This anonymous user is on a multiple I.P Address server. Last time it was blocked, I, a fair wikipedian, could not reverse some vandalism. However, I sign in, and this anonymous user does not. Could you please block just the I.P address, but if someone signs in it will be temporarily unblocked?

Thank you, ~Railcgun

[edit] Signpost updated for November 20th.

Weekly Delivery

Volume 2, Issue 47	20 November 2006	About the Signpost

One week later, Wikipedia reblocked in mainland China	Military history dominates writing contest
News and notes: Wikibooks donation, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcoming users

Hello! I have come across your name several times tonight while reverting vandalism and non-notable articles, here, here, here, here and here. Do you look at an editors' contributions before welcoming them? I suppose that if you welcome very many people then you are bound to come across a few vandals. It is wise to do a quick check of their contributions before issuing the welcome notice, as you may well come across a specific instance where directed advice or a warning would be well-placed. It seems incongruous to welcome someone one minute then have another person warn them about their actions. (aeropagitica) 22:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I notice you welcomed a user, Guggisberg, who put up a page on an ancestor of his, but there are no citations, and it is kind of a mess. I don't want to "bite" the newbie. Can you suggest something to him? -- Ssilvers 22:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Aero, that's a good idea and ill do that, and ssilvers, ill take a look ST47Talk 22:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vincent

Hello I am leaving a message here as requested. I started editing the Scott Ritter article because it is very biased. Vincent Farnsworth 20:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Vincent

[edit] Your RfA

... is transcluded incorrectly. You've transcluded your userpage instead. Yikes... riana_dzasta 17:58, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, that's not what you did... I fixed it. :) riana_dzasta 18:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

YIKES! i didn't mean to transclude my userpage - thanks for fixing it :P ST47Talk 18:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

I didn't think you did! Seemed a bit odd. ;) You're welcome. riana_dzasta 18:36, 23 November 2006 (UTC)