User talk:Srleffler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user is currently busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
Archive
Archives

Hi, feel free to leave me a message. Kindly leave messages on new topics at the bottom of this page. Srleffler

Contents

[edit] Intensity (physics)

Thanks for the helpful message. I was wnodering: is there a reason "Amplitude" links to a Wikipedia article but not "Strength" or "Pressure"? Thanks. TWCarlson 04:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] About your revert of Template:Talkarchive

since when could you use that template for such types of archves? →AzaToth 14:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Importance

I think on that one I ended up deciding that if Laser was top importance than optical cavity was High. Unfortunately importance is really vaguely defined. I was pretty unsure about polarizer and waveguide and figured that at least putting something a rating I was iffy on there would encourage anyone who disagrees with it to change it. — Laura Scudder ☎ 23:14, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Doing something about the ridiculous date autoformatting/linking mess

Dear Srleffler—you may be interested in putting your name to, or at least commenting on this new push to get the developers to create a parallel syntax that separates autoformatting and linking functions. IMV, it would go a long way towards fixing the untidy blueing of trivial chronological items, and would probably calm the nastiness between the anti- and pro-linking factions in the project. The proposal is to retain the existing function, to reduce the risk of objection from pro-linkers. Tony 15:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] reply

I protected the page for now. Can you help keep an eye on them for a little while and report them to WP:AIV if they keep at it? DVD+ R/W 06:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

well in that case, I blocked them. cheers, DVD+ R/W 06:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/r/l/User_talk%7ESrleffler_5b48.html"