Talk:Spoo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spoo is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.

Spoo appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 1, 2006.

This article is a former featured article removal candidate. Please see the archive to see why its featured status was upheld.

Spoo is a selected article on the Food Portal, which means that it has been identified as a high quality article by Food Portal standards.

Spoo has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Archives
Talk:Spoo/Archive

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Spoo article.
Please sign and date your posts using four tildes (~~~~). New discussion topics go at the bottom of the page; click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Frequently asked questions. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Talk page guidelines Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Don't bite the newcomers!

[edit] Reliable sources

This article refers to sources that are considered unreliable. No idea how this article ever came to become a FA. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 03:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps because your view on what sources are considered unreliable is a lot more restrictive than the mainstream? I don't see anything objectionable in the references myself (aside from formatting issues - could use more cite templates IMO). See Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Spoo, looks like there was a lot of discussion of the references there. Bryan 04:44, 3 September 2006 (UTC)