User talk:Splintercellguy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hey, just a note to say that you should check an article's history before declaring it blank and sending it for Speedy. I'd put the article up for deletion and the user was blanking it. I realise this isn't a big thing, but it could mess up the vfd I've already got for it. Kel-nage 21:19, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Bird strike
Hi. I have added the Bird cannon text to Bird strike again, but clearly marked it as an urban legend. Hope this is OK with you. Happy editing -- Chris 73 Talk 10:55, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Stubs
Hello,
Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Stub_types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.
Thanks! Anguis 00:23, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] SGCSim
I just submitted my revision of the SGCSim artical, and checked the history to make sure I didnt go over any, and it looks like you edited it, and I went over it. If it was anything major, I am really sorry. If I messed anything up, could you please fix it, as I dont know if I did, and how to fix it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SGCSim_%28Computer_Program%29
tpg1989 07:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC) Thanks for your reply - Ive replied to that on my usertalk tpg1989 07:46, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Deleting Amitz
Hi, because you were involved with the article, you may want to look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amitiz (2nd nomination), best wishes, IZAK 14:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Request for edit summary
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 05:06, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Bah, too lazy :P but I'll keep that in mind Splintercellguy 05:11, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Well...
I still don't think tagging all of the talk pages does anything good for Pittsburgh. About the only thing Leechburg currently has to do with Pittsburg is if you threw a trash bag into the river, eventually it will float to Pittsburgh. I'm willing to bet that by tagging this town as a part of your project, aproximatly 0 progress on the Leechburg Article will happen over the next 10 years as a direct or indirect result. A town this far away simply will not benefit. Go tag Oakmont, they haven't been tagged yet. And they are way closer. They are even on the Allegheny River! :P back to you. --Cngodles 13:31, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yet the scope of the WikiProject would seem to encompass Leechburg? If you feel the article needs attention, you could go to the WikiProject and mark it for attention? Splintercellguy 16:34, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] your edit to User:Riz001
To leave someone a message, use their user talk page (like this one), not their User page. A User page is for editors to describe themselves. The User talk page (you want User talk:Riz001) is where they get messages. If you put something on the User page they will not get the yellow "You have new messages" bar. Fan-1967 23:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
