User talk:Spespatriae
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Spespatriae, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! MER-C 12:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Order of the German Eagle
I've tried to redirect the above article to the German Wikipedia for some strange reason it didn't work. Could you please translate the article? Thanks. MER-C 12:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:400px Service Cross of the German Eagle.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:400px Service Cross of the German Eagle.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:04, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 03:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fourth Rome
Please be aware that wikipedia has a policy of no original research. Your article will be deleted, so please don't waste your time. `'mikka (t) 09:37, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Never ever do what you did in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fourth Rome or you will be immediately blocked from editing. `'mikka (t) 10:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- You rush to conclusions. We do not live in a world as fast as you do. Come back tomorrow or next week to judge what is fit for deletion and what is not.Spespatriae 10:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- This is your another warning: please don't delete technical things without reading the corresponding policies. As for deletion, once again: wikipedia is not a place for personal essays. I gather you ignored my advice to read the listed policies. `'mikka (t) 15:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- You added this "technical thingy" of yours on the article based on your subjective interpretation what it was going to be about - after fifteen minutes from the exstance of the title. Let me remind you that wikipedia is and never will be a collection of finnished articles over agreed issues. IMHO you have acted as a bully and over reached your powers as a moderator for wikipedia. In fact you have acted as a censor.
- Fine, I don't have any reference to Fourth Rome other than that what the monk said of the possibilety ofd ever having a fourth Rome, an early soviet poem and an American fantasy sci-fi novel from 1996. There is no "Fourth Rome" in any political accounts. But since there was a claim for succession after Constantinople, a Third Rome, why wasn't there any attempt to find a new Rome after the fall of Holy Roman Empire and Russian Empire? The point is that this claim was essentially legal legitimation for Muskovite expansionist policies, especially towards Istanbul. These claims had no validity after the renaissance and Age of reason and theory of social contract. So delete the article. Spespatriae 15:39, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- This is your another warning: please don't delete technical things without reading the corresponding policies. As for deletion, once again: wikipedia is not a place for personal essays. I gather you ignored my advice to read the listed policies. `'mikka (t) 15:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- You rush to conclusions. We do not live in a world as fast as you do. Come back tomorrow or next week to judge what is fit for deletion and what is not.Spespatriae 10:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)