Talk:Species first discovered in Hong Kong
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The list is somewhat problematic...what does one mean by "native"?--K.C. Tang 12:27, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- i've revised the list, hope it's now less misleading...--K.C. Tang 00:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
-
- that then begs the question as to the page title, which is now misleading, as native would mean a full list of species found in HK except those introduced under deliberate or accidental human influence. So should this page be renamed for HK endemic species? HKmoths 14:21, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- I have some questions:
- that then begs the question as to the page title, which is now misleading, as native would mean a full list of species found in HK except those introduced under deliberate or accidental human influence. So should this page be renamed for HK endemic species? HKmoths 14:21, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- do we really need a list concerning HK species? is it significant?
- if we do need to have one, what should the list be about? "native species"? then the list is to be veeeeeery long, and bound to be incomplete. "endemic species"? about 10-15 species can be listed, i guess, but one may assume that many of them will sooner or later turn out themselves in Guangdong Province, thus the list become inaccurate...--K.C. Tang 06:56, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- i suggest the list be renamed "Species first discovered in Hong Kong", which, by definition, will include the endemic species.--K.C. Tang 00:05, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
-
-
