Talk:Special revelation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] NPOV
A request was made to explain the problems with the current version so it can be fixed. Here goes:
- It assumes that God exists, which is disputed.
- It assumes that God has a gender, and that this gender is male; that's disputed, too. The compromise on God is to use only gender-neutral terms like "God" and "the deity" unless you are referring to a particular conception of God.
- It fails to distinguish the theology of the LDS church from that of other denominations.
- It fails to clarify what "Orthodox Christianity" is; that page is a disambiguation page.
- It should couch whatever explanation it makes in terms of third-party claims; it shouldn't sound like Wikipedia itself is saying these claims are true or false.
- Who are these vaguely defined "Christian theologians"? This doctrine does not appear to be universal.
- It would be interesting to see explanation to any denominations or theologians who have specifically denied this doctrine, if any.
- The necessary antecendents of "salvation" are disputed; this article should make clear which sect's conception of salvation it is referring to.
General comments:
- It should not use the second person - e.g. "we" and "us".
- It would be useful to have the explanation about general vs. special vs. direct early on.
- Revelation cites the book of Timothy; it would be good if this article more explicity describes the source(s) of the doctrine.
- It would be useful to give specific notable examples, and to discuss the circumstances in which special revelation is believed to have occurred - after prayer? At times of cosmic significance? Can anyone be a recipient? Etc.
-- Beland 03:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sources
I am finding it difficult to find proper sources to rewrite this article. Most stuff I can find is ultimately somebody's personal opinion, any ideas? Sam Hayes 23:20, 19 October 2006 (UTC)