Talk:Spanish Legion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Sex, drugs and violence

I have just heard Nacho Vidal talking about some September day when legionnaires celebrate bringing drugs and whores to the barracks. Somebody with more knowledge should clarify what is real and what legend.

I have also heard about raids against Muslim neighbourhoods in Melilla. --Error 23:30, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Hello again Error! As to the raidings, they did happen up to the 80's (don't know as of today) My recollection from talks with former legionaires was that they where considered "a matter of honor" (i.e. only as revenge/police action after an actual or alleged mistreatment on a legionarie or related person), and the only weapon the "honor code" allowed was the belt (i suppose more than one knife would be also present ...)
What I heard should be the 1990s. --Error 23:02, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
Don't have any reference about a September celebration, but drug abuse (topically marihuana, called "grifa") and whoring were part of the "clasical" legionary way of life from the start, and, at least, tolerated even in the most prudish times (the 40's and 50's)----Wllacer 16:55, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

According to Vidal, on that day a plain soldier could go to an officer and challenge him to a boxing match to settle accounts. Sort of Saturnalia. --Error 23:02, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

With the September 20 reference you found, the feasting Vidal describes seems more than plausible, but i very much doubt it's allowed now (It's too "unpolitically correct" for the times).
The tradition of boxing to settle matters between two legionaries is as old as the Legion (probably even older) Personal grudges can be damning for the whole unit in "live or death" situations elite soldiers are expected to endure; therefore the founders instituted boxing as a mechanism to avoid them. Disputes btw. legionaries should be settled not thru intervention of the Chain of Command, neither let them pass unresolved, but openly thru a fist fight (kind of a duel). It was expected that afterward, both would go out together friendly and get drunk. Such a fight between a soldier and an officer could therefore happen --Wllacer 12:26, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Foreigners in the Spanish Foreign Legion in the '50s-'80s

I Salute all!

Im curious to know whether non-spaniard soldiers were served with the Tercios during the Cold War?

The reason Im asking is that I heard a couple people saying, that "most expatriates then gone for the French Foreign Legion, but a handful also to Spain - and that was the harder way..."

Anyone who can tell if there were any other nationalities? (i hope its not secret)

User:Rabapone

I don't know the details but there were people from Spanish Guinea. --Error 00:18, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
Add to the list germans, belgians ( both a lot after 1945), french (some after the 60's), south americans (lately the most common ones) and morocans (only after 1956. At least with initial morocan nationality, but now most reared in Spain) I coudn't find any list of nationalities, and AFAIK foreigners were always a minority--Wllacer 09:14, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

THX for Your Info!

Well, I'm particularly interested in that any east-european nationalities ever served in this once "Men's last Refuge" Spanish Foreign Legion? You know I'm hungarian (which is a once-Warsaw Pact, now-NATO country), and I served Hungarian Army (Honvedseg), and i did met people telling me, that a number of hungarians, slovakians, czech, polish and alike served in the Tercios.

Somehow i am interested in the Cold War period of Europe, ant particarly in the history of the Spanish and French Foreign Legions, and the Rhodesian Ligth Infantry, etc. that was a _possible_ 'hiding place' for many of east-european dissidents and expatriates who were forced to run from the communists.

And one more question: is there an english-language discussiopn group of the Spanish Foreign Legion ?

thx: User:Rabapone


[edit] Requested move

Spanish Foreign Legion → Spanish Legion – The current official name is Spanish Legion. This is reflected in the Spanish version of the article already. The article was unilaterally moved from its original title (i.e. Spanish Legion) by someone back in July as a matter of personal preference without any discussion.E Asterion u talking to me?

The result of the discussion was to move. - Bobet 09:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

  • Oppose - Because in English is largely known as "Spanish Foreign Legion".--Kwame Nkrumah 15:28, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: This name is incorrect at the present time. For example, NATO does not refer to it as Spanish Foreign Legion but Spanish Legion. The entry Spanish Foreign Legion could stay as a redirect even if it is an anacronyism. E Asterion u talking to me? 21:58, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: But you agree with me that this new "Spanish Legion", whatever its official name, is the same as the unit commonly known as "Spanish Foreign Legion", and that no other unit can be called "Spanish Foreign Legion" now, don't you? In this case, the commonest name in use i "Spanish Foreign Legion", and this should be the name of the article.--Kwame Nkrumah 22:12, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: No, "Spanish Foreign Legion" is not the commonest name (neither in English [1][2] nor Spanish [3][4]). Even if it was, there may also be more "hits" for Rhodesia but we still call that country "Zimbabwe". This is an encyclopedia and needs to be accurate. The Spanish Legion was formerly known as Spanish Foreign Legion. IMHO, the article should reside at Spanish Legion and a redirect created for Spanish Foreign Legion, the way the articles were originally set up as. I will try to place a Request for Comments and contact people previously involved with the article too. Regards, E Asterion u talking to me? 08:27, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Support: return to page's original and accurate name. (I wonder if a vote is even necessary to undo a move that had zero legitimacy to begin with.) Kwame Nkrumah's argument about the most common name, besides ignoring which name is actually correct, is disingenuous in that most English-language literature concerning the Legion addresses its role in the Spanish Civil War - i.e. uses 1930s nomenclature. As previously stated, an extension of this method would result in renaming "Canada" to "Dominion of Canada" and similar nonsense. Albrecht 20:32, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose - searching the original article title reveals that the article was originally called the Spanish Foreign Legion, (its original name) which is what is known as to the English speakers here on English Wikipedia. Whatever NATO calls it is not relevant. And what's wrong with the Dominion of Canada?--Tomtom 00:53, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • If you read further up, you should convince yourself that Foreign Legion is not even the most commonly used form in English. E Asterion u talking to me? 01:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Irrelevant? Somehow, I think the NATO designation should hold more weight than, say, what some random guy on Wikipedia decided. And if you're not convinced, I'd also take a look at what the Spanish Army itself calls the unit. [5] Albrecht 13:45, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong support. (Nominator's) --E Asterion u talking to me? 01:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Support. The Google test spanish.foreign.legion+-wikipedia vs. spanish.legion+-wikipedia gives 10 to 1 results in favor of the simpler name. --Dhartung | Talk 05:11, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Support unless there is a much more compelling argument against (like if it turned out that the bulk of the pages in the spanish.legion+-wikipedia test were false positives). If the Google test coincides with the current official name, it's hard to see the basis for claiming that the historical name is more common, though of course it should still be preserved as a redirect. - Jmabel | Talk 15:43, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Whatever. I don't care as long as there are redirects. --Error 20:09, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fort Bragg

I doubt that a Spanish unit is stationed at Fort Bragg. --Error 22:12, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

No, it's not that. The text is not very clear but it says the Legion have trained in various different areas, including SERE at Fort Bragg. Regards, E Asterion u talking to me? 00:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/p/a/Talk%7ESpanish_Legion_0066.html"