Talk:Southern Pacific 4449

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good articles Southern Pacific 4449 has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do.
If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance within the Trains WikiProject.
DYK A fact from this article appeared in the "Did you know" section of Portal:Trains on January 8, 2006.
Selected This article was displayed as the Portal:Trains "Selected article" for week 19, 2006.
This article is maintained by the Locomotives task force.

[edit] GA nomination comments

Before this article can be listed as a good article, I think the following things should be corrected:

  • Lead section needs a bit of work - the first sentence is not clear at all to a layman. The last sentence cries out for a source. Overall it should summarise a bit more of the article's content, and should also cater for our international readership by stating which country the locomotive is in.
  • POV phrases such as 'They work hard to keep it running' need to be removed
  • Section headings should be capitalised like sentences - see WP:MOS. Worldtraveller 12:52, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments, I've addressed them as follows:

  1. Expanded the lead to include significant bits of the locomotive's history, and to (hopefully) clarify the first sentence; removed the "most photographed" line since it was unreferenced.
  2. Performed a copyedit to remove POV comments and clarify a couple points.
  3. "Oaks Park" and "American Freedom Train" are proper nouns and should be typed in this manner. I've updated the other section headings.

Slambo (Speak) 20:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC)