Talk:Southeastern Anatolia Project

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Southeastern Anatolia Project article.

WikiProject Turkey This article is part of WikiProject Turkey, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Turkey-related topics. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Former FA This article is a former featured article candidate. Please view its sub-page to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Archive1

Contents

[edit] Last edit

Duk was one step ahead of me so my last edit was basicaly a spelling imrpovement. No praragraph was introduced. Just a bunch of minor edits. --Cool Cat My Talk 16:04, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] What are you trying to proove?

The flooding of historical sites are well known this is mentioned on the page. Flooding of villiges is also mentioned. Exactly what part of providing people water and power violates human rights? Next time when I ask you to discuss something in talk I want to see something in talk, you got that? Do not just revert me, its something I am sick of. --Cool Cat My Talk 14:39, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

Finally, a number of judicial questions needed clearing over the flooding of several historical sites as well as local residence. You cover it briefly, I cover it in more detail. Mine stays. PS. Its "prove", not "proove". - FrancisTyers 15:04, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
Ok, the bridge is yours captain. I am sick of dealing with this crap. --Cool Cat My Talk 15:56, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

Although sorced I realy dispute the factual acuracy of the Kurdish Human Rights Project report. A short peek at the cite will show the cite is less than neutral. What kind of a human rights organisation fail to condem both sides? --Cool Cat Talk 23:43, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

sounds like original research. re: What kind of a human rights organisation fail to condem both sides? — are you serious here?
— Davenbelle 10:00, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
I was quoting the founder of the Turkish Human Rights Organisation who resigned his post recently noting "PKK takeing over the I.H.D." and used that quote. --Cool Cat Talk 13:06, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
Plus why are you here? Stalking me around? --Cool Cat Talk 13:07, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Criticism section

As I have told davenbelle earlier on, the criticism section is not in accordance with wikipedias neutral point of view policy. It is biased and one sided. --Cat out 19:16, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

I want to have your attention to the fact that the whole anatolia is settled begginning from the ancient times. As a person who traveled nearly %80 of it I assure you that you can hardly find a village without an ancient fountain or similar ancient ruins. But a country still needs hydroelectric power and it is nothing but simple logic to build the necessary dams on the greatest rivers. I think the cristism section is a bit biased and unrealistic. Thalion Hurin 19:18, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hasankeyf is not related to Kurdish culture or Kurdish history.

Hasankeyf is not related to Kurdish Culture or Kurdish History. This is certainly not NPOV and must be removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BlueEyedCat (talkcontribs) 16:29, 3 December 2006 (UTC).