Talk:South Tibet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is it sure that South Tibet and Arunachal Pradesh are the same place? I don't think so.And South Tibet is part of Tibetan culture for long time. you can go to Tibet to clarify it.Ksyrie 02:45, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

South Tibet (藏南) is just what China calls Arunachal Pradesh, according to that article. I myself have never heard "South Tibet" used by Tibetans. Another thing, I thought that most of the ethnic groups in Arunachal Pradesh weren't Tibetans, but different tribal peoples. Correct me if I'm wrong. (for both of the things I said) --Khoikhoi 02:49, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

I didn't mean they are Tibetan but only they are Tibetan or of Thai-Burmese origin.And for more South Tibet has much links with Tibet as I knowKsyrie 03:23, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Yes, but did the Tibetans refer to it as South Tibet? It seems that it is just a Chinese term, and should be merged into the main article, Arunachal Pradesh. --Khoikhoi 05:29, 4 January 2006 (UTC)