Talk:South African farm attacks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a controversial topic, which may be under dispute. Please read this talk page and discuss substantial changes here before making them. Make sure you supply full citations when adding information to highly controversial articles.

This article is a frequent source of heated debate. Please try to keep a cool head when commenting here.

[edit] Previous discussions

• Archive 1 (start to December 2005):

Rewrite —  POV —  Weasel words —  But who are the Weasels? —  Murder rate among white SA commercial farmers — control calculation —  Sections —  Controversial

• Archive 2 (December 2005 to October 2006):

Agricultural output / Missing mealies • Daily bloodshed - death squads • Racist Boers Nostalgic for Apartheid? • POV/research/Black negationism • Struggle songs and hate speech • Genocide • Title. • (Moved to talk page) • Biased • Proposed page move to South African farm attacks • Redirect pages up for deletion • Title? Please. •

[edit] Edit of 18:00, 26 October 2006

As part of the edit I did, I commented out (but did not delete) the "Criticism" section due to the following concerns:

• The first sentence is just a broad statement without being backed up by a reliable source
• The second sentence (which IS referenced) is referring to the use of the well-known political slogan "Kill the Boer, kill the farmer" in a post-apartheid setting where it has been defined as hate speech. This is fine, but here is my problem: the connection between officials "not stopping crowds chanting this slogan" and the government "failing to take appropriate measures against these attacks" has no basis in fact. The editor who originally put this in created a logical leap in his own mind between the two incidents, which constitutes original research and is not permitted. The reason I commented it out instead of deleting is so that IF a reliable reference is found that makes this logical connection then it can be re-stated, citing the appropriate reference.
• The second paragraph of that section is also unreferenced and in fact does not seem to belong in that section.

I also removed the long-standing unreferenced "reasoning behind the attacks" speculation. There has been more than ample time given to find a reference to those claims. They can be added back in with a reliable reference. I also re-arranged the rest of the article to improve style and flow, putting the TAU's response to the Committee of Inquiry report in the correct chronological place, and moving GW's claims to the lead-in section as it seems more logical there. Zunaid ^(T•C) Please rate me at Editor Review! 16:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Reference added. Farmer armies in the killing fields --Jvb – October 27, 2006

That reference you provide is an article about farmers conducting patrols etc. It does not address any of the points I raised above. I'm off home now, but next week I'll write in a section about the farm patrols using the ref you provided. Zunaid ^(T•C) Please rate me at Editor Review! 14:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

I disagree. The suspended “Criticism of government” section of the article does address the points you raise. Indeed, saying that the police "are not part of the solution but part of the bloody problem" is, if not worse, saying the same as that “Critics of the government say that the South African government is failing to take appropriate measures against these attacks”. Therefore I unsuspended the incriminated section. --Jvb – November 7, 2006

I've rewritten the section to reflect exactly the quote that was made, with the correct attribution. I've also included a mention about the farm patrols in that same section. However, points 2 and 3 have still not ben addressed with the addition of this particular reference so I've commented them back out. Zunaid©^{Please rate me at Editor Review!} 14:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Neutrality tag

I feel the article as it stands is fairly neutral and generally balances out the viewpoints presented, thus the neutrality tag should be removed. Comments? Zunaid©^{Please rate me at Editor Review!} 11:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

It seems okay to me too. Zyxoas (talk to me - I'll listen) 16:40, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

• NOT NEUTRAL - This article is not neutral, and the tag should not be removed.--222.154.88.252 00:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Care to explain your reasoning? Zunaid©^{Please rate me at Editor Review!} 14:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Crime Expo South Africa

A link should be added to the Crime Expo South Africa article, as it exposes the South African farm attacks / Farm murders. The editors (Zyxoas / Zunaid) above would be object to it, whilst stating that this article is neutral. --222.154.88.252 00:49, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

These editors are being paid to edit this article, and a photograph of them will be published shortly.--222.154.88.252 00:52, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

222.154.88.252 is a disgruntled ex-pat now in New Zealand, methinks, trying to justify their exit. Wizzy…☎ 07:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

There's nothing wrong witht that. He or they had sufficient reason for leaving. --Adriaan90 08:11, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

A photograph of me!? I'd love to see this one, please!! Btw my name is Tebello Thejane, I'm 22 years old, and I live in Meyerton -- I can give you even more info should you need it. This should be interesting... o_O Zyxoas (talk to me - I'll listen) 09:44, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

This is rather amusing; must say. Thank the FSM for emigration, that way we can get rid of some of our racists, moaners and wallies... Mikker ^(...) 18:43, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Wow what a disgusting thing to say. Do you think whites are the only people to be affected by crime and want to emigrate?? Go and take a look at News24.co.za and remove your blinkers. I fully agree that the link to Crime Expo should be added - most of the incidents there are not reported by newspapers as they are 'so common'. SparrowsWing 23:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Ummm... no I don't think "whites are the only people to be affected by crime and want to emigrate". Where the hell did you get that from? And I've had more than my fair share of break-ins and other criminal events, so I'm not saying crime isn't a problem. I'm saying SA has an unusually large number of stupid idiots, people who do nothing but moan and racists. Thankfully, some of these emigrate. Good riddance. Mikker ^(...) 23:49, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Then I do apologise - I totally misread what you said. Crime is something that affects all people in South Africa ... and you are quite correct - moaning will not change or improve things. SparrowsWing 23:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)