Talk:Soul patch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Photo Please

Can we have a photo of this?

Now we have a photo - but due to the lighting used, the soul patch itself isn't clearly visible. I suggest Robert Pires.JPG as a better photo.
Except that's not a soul patch. wbm

Looks like a cool soul patch to me.

[edit] Alternate Names

Do we really need all the different names for a soul patch? Names like ball-tickler, taint-brush, and flavor-saver are just sexual jokes, not actual names for the beard. No barber will ever offer to trim your ball tickler. --Dr.Worm 15:13, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Are they needed? Not for raw communication, but those terms are common & are therefore relevent. I should know - as a wearer of a soul patch, I've heard most of those many times over. wbm 15:13, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

From what I knew, it was called flavor-saver because it retains the flavor of what you've just eaten (like in the Italian saying "to lick your own mustache"). I don't think it's sexual - or is it?

hahaha there is nothing common about those synonyms. PLEASE DON'T DELETE THEM.

What is the reference to "youth pastor"? The point of an encyclopedia is the passing on of information. The "and we all know why" reference is unprofessional & immature. We don't all know why. It needs to be explained. wbm 15:18, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

> crab-catcher, soup catcher, flavor stripe or flavor-saver.[citation needed] You will get those citations when homer simpson get one!

Every one of these terms should probably have a citation. Just because you heard somebody somewhere someday refer to a soul patch as a skipadeedoo doesn't make it relevant for the article. --Onorem 11:34, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cookie duster?

I thought that was a moustache. If your soul patch is dusting your cookies, it appears that you're trying force them into your chin and not putting them in your mouth.

[edit] Famous Wearers

Is there any real reason to keep expanding this section? I could be mistaken, but I thought the point of sections like this was to provide a few examples. If the point is to list every famous person that has a soul patch, would it make sense to put it into list form. It's turning into a pretty ugly paragraph the way it is.--Onorem 12:18, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

You are right, that section is pretty ridiculous. Everyone seems to put their favourite crush object. What's the point, anyway? Unless someone is known primarely for wearing a soul patch it doesn't make sense to list them here.--345Kai 06:58, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] why soul patch?

Could someone please elaborate on where the name soul patch comes from?--345Kai 07:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC)