User talk:SoLittleTime

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It is suspected that this user might be a sock puppet or impersonator of Cplot.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.


Contents

[edit] Stub template on user page

Hi SoLittleTime - hope you don't mind but I subst'ed the stub template on your talk page, so that it doesn't turn up in a category of articles for editors to expand.

.

Oh, and Welcome!

Hello, SoLittleTime, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Grutness...wha? 00:30, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

thanks. sorry about the misuse of the stub thing. didn realize is would do that. never had a userpage before. --SoLittleTime 00:33, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during December 3, 2006 (UTC) to Talk:Yak

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —Řÿūłóñģ (竜龍) 03:35, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Arbitration

I have reverted your removal of evidence at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Seabhcan/Evidence. If you have a comment or objection to make about the evidence in the case, you should create a new section labled == Evidence from SoLittleTime == and make your remarks there. I would like to point out that you did not remove Travb's evidence, but rather NuclearUmpf's analysis of Travb's evidence. Also, if you are taking responsibility for anonymous edits previously attributed to cplot, you will probably need to offer some explanation as to who you are, since this account is brand new. Thatcher131 03:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification. Could you please give my apologies to Travb. I realized my mistake, but by then I had already been blocked and couldn't correct. It's definitly NuclearUmpf I had inteded to expose as a fraud. Wow. Is my face red.
Also, I would be happy to enter into arbitration, as soon as rhe ridiculous sham of Federal Clowns running around pretending that they're not has ended. Until that happens, I plan to become a permanent fixtture[1] here on Wikipedia. Have a great weekend.. I wish administrators here would start showing their ability to assume good faith. With every action I take, I'm reverted and told to stop under the mistaken presumption that I'm not here to help Wikipedia. If the amdministrators don't follow their own rules, I would think others will start to follow suit. --SoLittleTime 04:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
I warned you first, then when I saw the rest of your contributions I banned you as the reincarnation of a banned user. The problem is that even if Nuclear or other editors are being paid by the government to edit wikipedia, no one is likely to care. Generally a person's identity is of no concern, what matters is the content and quality of their edits. Unlike some obscure topic where deceptive editing might last a long time without being spotted, there are many strong personalities on all sides of conspiracy/CIA/9-11 issues and deceptive or inaccurate edits are rather quickly stamped out. Unless you are simply amusing yourself, you should find some more constructive way to contribute than the equivalent of standing on a streetcorner shouting obscenities at passersby. Thatcher131 20:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
You do realize that the strategy to tell me that no one will care about this issue was my idea. You should be careful who you take your orders from. You're taking them from the enemy and then dutifully following them. --SoLittleTime 21:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Made me laugh. Thatcher131 01:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

See you Clowns are getting a sense of humor. I'll tell you what, let's go with the hypothesis that nobody cares. Let me post one of my pieces on the Village Pump New and leave it there for the duration. If nothing comes of that, I'll move on. Come on, here's a chance for you Clowns to prove you're not cowards. That's an opportunity you may never have again in your lifetimes. --SoLittleTime 18:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

SAY NO TO USEBACA AGITPROP !
Member #1, COUNTER-USEBACA Squad




F.A.A.F.A. 10:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Thank you for experimenting with the page Talk:Life (Ricky Martin album) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--Tbeatty 06:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Yak. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Tbeatty 06:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Talk:Bob Cole (announcer), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tbeatty 06:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/o/l/User_talk%7ESoLittleTime_7cf8.html"