User talk:Smack
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149
>> User talk:Smack/archive0
>> User talk:Smack/archive1
[edit] Needmoney90
Hello, i found out how to do this, sorry for not contacting you sooner. In scouts, we had a knot tying competition, and we had to memorize some things on notecards. one of the things was the king of knots, or the square knot. Talk to me if you feel the need! needmoney90
[edit] revise 'Tent'
Hi Smack, I'm thinking about completely revising Tent, as detailed on the tent discussion page. Any comments/suggestions? Murray Langton 09:47, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Scouting article improvement
User:Gadget850 has started User talk:Gadget850/BSA article improvements as a step toward improving the BSA section of Wikipedia. Please visit this page and participate if you are interested or cross yourself out of the "Interested Wikipedians" if you are not interested. Thank you. Rlevse 18:24, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cabin tent?
I don't know what a 'cabin' tent is or looks like - it's not a name used in UK/Europe/NZ. Can you point me at a website with a picture of a cabin tent, please? Murray Langton 06:49, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Persian arts template
Are you involved with the template? It could use some tender loving care. Surely it could be prettier. Expand it just a wee bit, have a colored background, and perhaps a bit of arabesque on the top? If not you, who? Zora 07:56, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Category war
Please consider going to Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion#Category:Boy_Scouts_of_America_controversy_and_Category:Boy_Scouts_of_America_controversies_to_.28he_didn.27t_say_what.29 and voting on this (we want delete) and the "Contentious issues" listing right below it (we want keep). There are constant edit wars on the "Controversies about..." article, so I don't really worry about it, but I would like to keep the contentious issues grouped together in the project as they relate to Scouting. Rlevse 11:58, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Link/reference editing
If you don't know what you are editing and how it relates to an article then don't do it. Try not to be a Schmuck, ok? Ati3414 09:42, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RFM#age of earth
Hi Smack, thanks for notice of the Request for mediation. I don't think I was involved with the dispute much, other than responding to Ati's empty threat on my talk page, but I guess my name on the RFM doesn't hurt. It might be useful mention How to calculate Earth's Age (AfD discussion), an already-deleted POV/content fork by Ati. —Quarl (talk) 2006-02-12 12:54Z
Hi - thanks for the notice, I was going to mention the Afd bit, but Quarl done did that :-) Ati3414 also created How old is the Earth?, with the same content on Jan. 31 [1], it was turned into a redirect by User:Peruvianllama within a few minutes. Anon 67.170.224.36 re-instated it Feb 1 & I reverted [2]. Just a bet more info for the RFM, I would add it to the request - but not sure of the protocol there. Vsmith 14:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar
[edit] Lattice
I think your reorganization of the lattice disambiguation page made it disorganized. The various meanings of the word lattice are derived from, and explained by the original meaning. The page should make that clear, instead of making it look as if these different meanings are unrelated. Michael Hardy 03:00, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Adminship
Hi Smack, I would like to nominate you to become an administrator, if you are ready. —Quarl (talk) 2006-02-27 09:52Z
- I don't know whether or not I'm ready. What exactly does adminship entail? --Smack (talk) 04:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Well, adminship itself entails doing chores :) such as deleting pages that should be deleted. Since such things require more judgement than just editing pages the community only grants certain powers to users they trust. If you're interested in becoming an administrator but don't know anything about it yet, I suggest reading up on Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list and Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship, and voting regularly in WP:RFA. —Quarl (talk) 2006-02-28 06:11Z
-
-
- I'm honored, but I think I'll decline. It would give me some nice powers, but I don't really see a need for them. On the other hand, it seems that adminship would obligate me to consistently keep track of Wikipedia policy, whether or not it impinges specifically on what I'm doing. --Smack (talk) 07:00, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Boy Scouts of America
Before you get too deep into it, see the split discussion at Talk:Boy Scouts of America. Since this has been posted for over a week, I'm going to do this soon. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 09:05, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Malplaced dab: Leningrad
I didn't end up fixing your Malplaced dab request, and have removed it from the list. The reason is in the history of Malplaced dabs.--Commander Keane 08:06, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Why cleanup on husky?
You added a cleanup tag to husky and I'm not sure why. I've done a lot of work on dab pages and have gone back to the MoS:DP to double-check, and I'm not sure what exactly you had in mind. Can you be more specific on the talk page, please? Thanks. Elf | Talk 18:22, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Knot Infoboxes
If you're going to be adding infoboxes to knot articles, I would suggest creating a template rather than hard coding the boxes in every article--changing one template would be a whole lot easier if a change is ever needed. See Wikipedia:Infobox templates. --66.41.217.182
Or using Template:Knot-details (instead of creating another one) --66.41.217.182
Ah fahget it I see you are doing just that. Great :-) --66.41.217.182
[edit] Campfire
I took a stab at the campfire article, but it probably needs some more work. Have a look if you like. Rlevse 13:43, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Drilling and threading
I noticed you put an {{Attention}} tag on the Drilling and threading page about a month ago. Could you please specify what kinds of improvements or clean-up are needed to the article, preferably on its talk page? I'm sure that we at Wikipedia:WikiProject Woodworking and Wikipedia:WikiProject Metalworking would be quite prepared to improve the article if we get some feedback on what you think is wrong with it. Thank you. Luigizanasi 21:03, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Campfire
That's okay. If you want to edit it, go ahead. And yes, I do value your input. Also, I trust you far more than the guy who gutted it--what he did may have may it less of a "how to", but it neutered it into an almost valueless article IMHO. Rlevse 09:52, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Scouting article work
If you are getting this, it is because you do or did work on Scouting articles (see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Scouting#Participants_and_primary_areas_of_interest).
As the Scouting WikiProject has been formed since early January 2006, we've had many great improvements made in this area of Wiki and I want to personally thank everyone for their help. We don't always agree on things, but we keep moving forward. YIS, Rlevse 22:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Intentional double-redirect
One word: why? OZLAWYER talk 12:48, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Fishknot.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Fishknot.png. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Scalar disambiguation
In scalar disambiguation page the word 'atomic' is used. Could you please explain in what way the word is relevant there. --Profero 12:25, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply on my discussion page (should this have been posted there too?). I understand you mean (4. Unable to be split or made any smaller), but I still don't understand why a scalar (computing) "that can hold only one value at a time" must be referred to as this. A bit, though, I agree in a sense is 'atomic' – but even a bit is either 1 or 0. And scalar in mathematics can be any number. I'm aware of my lack of knowledge in these fields, but as far as I know the word seems irrelevant here. I hope you don't mind me asking for a deeper explanation. --Profero 08:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- FYI, there is no difference between a pseudoscalar in physics and mathematics, and therefore nothing to disambiguate. Its the same thing. linas 03:29, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- And after seeing this talk page, I'll also note that there is no difference between scalars in math, physics and computing, those articles should all be merged together. :-/ Maybe you'd be interested in doing such a merge? linas 03:33, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Smack Pride
Yes, both you and User:JoeSmack can share in Smack Pride. Rich Farmbrough 14:57 20 June 2006 (GMT).
[edit] A graph or table based on decimal values is incorrect
A graph that is based upon decimal values will not show that half-life computation ends when the number of Carbon-14 atoms is less than one. If you use decimal variables to make the graph then the graph will drop below one and continue ad infintium. The reason for using a table is to clearly show that the results of the half-life computation using integer variables overcomes this problem and allows a table or a graph to reflect the truth that when the number of Carbon-14 atoms is less than one the process of half-life decay is over. I don't think you comprehend this fact. ...IMHO (Talk) 04:20, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hydrogen-like atom math
Hello Smack. I wanted to bring your attention to some recent changes to your contributions to Atomic orbital (I didn't think you would be aware of these changes because the content has since been moved to Hydrogen-like atom). Because you were the original contributor to the relevant sections (see here and here), I thought you might want to provide some input on these recent changes. Basically, some of us expressed on Talk:Hydrogen-like atom that it seemed more appropriate to not include Z in the definition for "a" and to change the relationship of "a" to the Bohr radius. If you agree that these changes are appropriate, it would be great if you could check the accuracy of my edits. Thanks!--GregRM 14:11, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
PS...I noticed that the Tipler and Llewellyn reference that you added in the same edit as your math contributions had not been copied to the Hydrogen-like atom article. I have copied the reference to the Hydrogen-like atom article. Does the current content of the Atomic orbital article still include information from this reference, or has it all been moved to Hydrogen-like atom? Thanks!--GregRM 14:26, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response on my Talk page. I appreciate the information.--GregRM 20:02, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed Georgia Move
As a past participant in the discussion on how to handle the Georgia pages, I thought you might be interested to know that there's a new attempt to reach consensus on the matter being addressed at Talk:Georgia (country)#Requested_Move_-_July_2006. Please come by and share your thoughts to help form a consensus. --Vengeful Cynic 03:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Grand Canyon of the Tuolumne needs sources?
Hi, Smack.. Someone slapped an "unverified" on that article. Most of it was your material (as I recall) --- could you sprinkle citations into it? Thanks! -- hike395 17:30, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- I was afraid of that. I, too, know the Canyon, and everything you wrote matches my experiences. But, sadly, that strictly isn't correct for Wikipedia, because it probably qualifies as original research. :-(. I'll try and look for books that contain info, and see if I can do citations. Very little time for WP in my life, though, so it'll have to be slow. hike395 04:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Scouting Barnstar
- A hearty thank you for your steadfast, tireless, and quality contributions to Scouting articles. Rlevse 01:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Gabe
Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Gabe. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bradcis 05:44, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Lake of the Lone Indian!
Did you hike in over the Silver Divide, or down from Reds Meadow or Duck Pass?
(just found your photo at Commons, way cool) hike395 13:29, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re Bosnia
I think it is pritty clear what user Bosoni is trying to allude to: ie Bosniaks are the heirs to Bosnia.
quite frankly wikipedia is about neutrality, and 2(Serbs and Croats)! of the 3 CONSTITUENT NATIONS of BiH have a very conflicting view with this, so therefore their view, regarding a ISSUE that CONCERNS THEM, should also be heard.
i suggested 2 neutral versions, which would be NUETRAL to ALL concerned parties, however it seems that Bosnoni is very eager to pass his very one minded revisionist agenda regarding the history of BiH.
This is the version i would want to pass
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bosnia_%28disambiguation%29&oldid=71162156 or as a last resort include Croats and Serbs aswell!
however Bosnoni wants this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bosnia_%28disambiguation%29&oldid=72221430
quite a diference isnt there..?..again it is ironic that Bosoni puts a Neutrality tag on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosnians 'Note on use of term 'Bosnian-Herzegovinian' and as i can see from his contribution to the discussion page has some issues with describing the actions of some Bosniaks "aggresive" with regards to the noun Bosnian and sinominsouly associating it to Bosniaks.
CLEARLY the user Bosoni is the epitome of these 'agressive efforts' through his actions on the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bosnia_%28disambiguation%29&oldid=72221430
[edit] Survival skills
I ought surely to have offered a talk page explanation as to my application of the {{howto}} tag, and I'm sorry for having omitted such explanation; I was paring a long list of articles with which I'd found, at some point, some problem that I'd hoped to remedy, and I rather failed fully to explain a few tags. In any event, I'll try to offer straightaway an explanation at Talk:Survival skills, although I do gather that, whilst some formulations may be unencyclopedic (in, perhaps, exorbitant detail), there don't appear to be glaring how-to problems, such that I'll remove the tag but nevertheless address my concerns on the talk page. Apologies once more for the oversight... :) Joe 05:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request
This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 21:42, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Middleearth.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Middleearth.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. Peter O. (Talk) 11:40, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Eriador.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Eriador.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. Peter O. (Talk) 12:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Middleearth.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Middleearth.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. Peter O. (Talk) 12:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Korova (Scottish band)
Hi, I'm thinking about nominating this for deletion as it contains no assertion of sginificance. If it meets WP:BAND, could you expand the article with material that shows how? Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 22:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note. Cool. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 01:05, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Graphics Lab
I saw your name listed on Wikiproject Illustration or the list of graphic artists, and I thought I'd let you know that a Graphics Lab has been created on EN. Based on the highly successful French and German graphics labs, it seeks to better organise and coordinate our graphic design and photo-editing efforts. Up until now, there has been no common space on EN where users could ask for maps, charts and other SVG files to be created. What's more, the Graphics Lab has discussion boards, tips, tools and links; in sum, a good common workspace. Come help us out! The infrastucture is already in place, and now we need participants. :) --Zantastik talk 00:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)