Talk:Smallville (Season 4)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Overview
The overview needs to be overhauled. As with the other seasons it contains too much information. It is like reading the episodes, only placed all together in one paragraph. It should only contain the major plot arcs for that season. Bignole 05:10, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphanbot
Hello folks. When OrphanBot removes an image, it should be treat as a final opportunity to rescue them by adding appropriate information on the image description page. Restoring them back to the article without rectifying the mistakes/missing info does not help. The JPS talk to me 10:07, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- I've rescued Image:Smallville season4.jpg The JPS talk to me 10:11, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- AwesomeBignole 11:11, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Season Pages or List of Episode (individual Ep pages)
All editors, please see discussion here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Smallville episodes Bignole 18:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Naked Clark
Bignole, you say "sorry, him being naked is not important". I'm not really interested in fighting about it, but I have to disagree. This is the first time that Clark and Lois meet, and I think it sets some of the stage for their future relationship. (I know it got me a chuckle in Fade when the tables were turned.)
Looking at it again, it might not be important enough for the Overview, but perhaps it could go in Crusade.
Thanks for the comma fixup in Bound. Jordan Brown 17:42, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- Are you trying to insinuate that her finding him naked in a cornfield, or him seeing her naked in the shower is what causes them to have a relationship later in life? I removed it because it wasn't an important detail that was going to alter the plot any. If it reads, "Lois finds Clark in a cornfield", I don't think adding "naked in a cornfield" is going to change the meaning any bit. And, as you said it "gave me a chuckle" is probably a good reason to not include it. You wouldn't want to point out all the jokes thereby ruining it for others. That was my reasoning behind it (and also because you wouldn't place it in paranthensis with an exclamation mark even if you were to include it). It wasn't personally against you or anything like that. Bignole 16:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
(Don't worry, I didn't interpret your comments as a personal attack.)
No... I'm suggesting that first impressions are important. Lois's first impressions of Clark are based on finding him naked in a corn field, acting even weirder than Clark usually acts. Most people meet this relatively normal fellow and then find out there are odd things about him... Lois met somebody really odd and then found that he sometimes acts normal. Can this *not* impact their relationship? Jordan Brown 17:42, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, but her impression wasn't about his nakedness, it was about the fact that she believed he was struck by lightning. The first thing she says to Martha wasn't about his being naked (though she made a joke about it), but more about the fact that she believed he was struck by lightning. The problem is with trying to assume what was going through a fictional character's mind when something happens. I don't think the fact that she found him naked in a field would impact their relationship anymore than when she was possessed by a spirit and had Clark take her to the prom, in pink no less. Bignole 22:33, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Eh, OK. Like I said, disagree but not interested in fighting. Jordan Brown 18:20, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bart Allen == The Flash
I found a citable reference equating the two, so I cited it and did. Let's talk about it over at Talk:Smallville (Season 5)#Equating Smallville characters with DC characters where I did the same with Aquaman. Jordan Brown 23:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
