Talk:Six figure income

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Six figure income article.

Maintained The following users are active in maintaining and improving this article. If you have questions regarding verification and sources, they may be able to help:
Brendel

[edit] Six figure income; a status symbol?

Is a 6 figure income still seen as a great status symbol? 100,000 Canadian dollars is only £48,000, and even 100,000 US Dollars is just £54,300. By way of comparison, 3 years ago the average income in London was £46,288 (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/inside_money/3132575.stm), with wage inflation of 4% that's £52,000 today (2006). Perhaps it's time to rename this entry to Seven Figure Income? Markb 10:00, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

US dollars a six fgiure salary is still a status symbol. Only 15% of households have incomes exceeding $100k, and that's households with a mean of two income earners! Only few Americans earned six figure salaries by themselves. Please try not to convert currencies, a millionaire in the US, measured in USD wouldn't be millionaire in Great Brtian, measured in Pounds, either and I doubt that London's population is that wealthy. For instance, the median household income of Beverly Hills is $75,000 a year, less than that of the city of London- the entire city? I do understand your point, but six figure incomes, espcially individual incomes, are still relatively rare at least according to 2005 Census data gathered US-wide (See the tables in the Household income in the United States article). FYI: If you have time for a pet project relating to status symbols look at the status symbol article, which truly is a mess. -and thanks for the interseting BBC published data. Signaturebrendel 14:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

I've given you a reference about the average household income in London, and it exceeds the £40,800 you quote for Beverly hills. Why shouldn't I convert currencies - more people, for example are paid in euros than in US dollars. Markb 06:56, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Becuase even though a Euro may be currently 30% worth more than a dollar, in a month it might only be 10% more than a dollar. So does a Euro actually loose pucharsing power inside Europe? In other words, the currency exchange rate does not always despict the actual domestic buying power- do 75USD in BV really buy less there than 46k Pounds do in London? BTW: I don't doubt that London is very wealthy, as far as big cities go, but I doubt that London's average income is higher than that of nearly 85% of all American households- nearly double the American median household income! Signaturebrendel 03:42, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
The latest government statistics (http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=285), give an average London wage of £29,000 - so for a two-worker household that's £58,000 per annum. Given the continual rise in house-prices, and that most mortgage companies lend up to three times joint-income, I'm not surprised. I take your point about the 'worth' of money in different countries & that 10 Euro will probably buy more in the USA than in Europe. As to Londoners earning more than 85% of the US, I don't see why this should be so surprising , London is an exceptional place within in Europe, let alone the UK. Given the above, maybe a six-figure income is still considered notable in the US, but the sterling equivalent in the UK is not. Markb 11:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Yes, that is indeed very plausable, a six-figure income may be more of a status symbol in the US while "the sterling equivalent in the UK is not." Often status symbols also change from place to place. A salary of $80k might be a status symbol in Witchita, Kansas whereas it would certaintly not be one in say, Manhattan or London for that matter. Signaturebrendel 18:17, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
I should also mention that most household in the US that have six-figure incomes, only have them because they also have two income earners. Best Regards, SignaturebrendelNow under review! 21:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)