User talk:SilvaStorm
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to my talk page!
Archives:
For discussion before December 8th, 2006, please go here
Contents |
[edit] Sorry.
I'm sorry. I wrote that 'Not in Portland' artical before Carlton Cuse confirmed it. By the way, are you the SilvaStorm from Lostpedia? --James W. 01:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Suffolk serial killer page
Hello. I noticed that you moved the subject page from "Suffolk" to "Ipswich". Firstly could I recommend that you discuss these significant edits on the talk page first as a large number of editors are contributing to the article in question and no doubt would like to voice their opinions on what the article should be called. Secondly, when moving a page you must ensure that any double redirects are changed, see here for the pages that needed to be changed. Cheers! Budgiekiller 08:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- ?The UK media is calling the killer the "Suffolk Strangler". --Dweller 08:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- It is common practice to discuss moving pages before just doing it, it is polite and considerate to other editors. If you read the talk page then you'll see that a lot of discussion had already taken place about the naming. It was decided that until more information became available we wouldn't change the name again. And I need to re-iterate, if you do move a page, ensure that you fix all the double redirects. Finally, none of the bodies were found in Ipswich, they were found in Suffolk, so please be careful before making such changes. Cheers! Budgiekiller 08:44, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Also, when using your customised signature, you should use the "subst:" beforehand so you're not actually putting the template on other user's pages. Cheers! Budgiekiller 08:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- FYI I've now fixed all the double redirects. Budgiekiller 09:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sig templates
About your signature, you're using a template in it and that's pretty much discouraged, see WP:SIG#Transclusion/template. There are very good reasons as to why we don't include templates in signatures, and it's not a good idea to bypass this and include them anyways. Just thought I'd let you know. -- Ned Scott 06:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
