Talk:Silver Certificate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of the WikiProject Numismatics, which is an attempt to facilitate the categorization and creation of accurate and formal Numismatism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join and see a list of open tasks to help with.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Silver Certificates, not FRNs!

I appreciate the enthusiasm of 129.137.181.252, but this article about Silver Certificates only! The Federal Reserve Notes are endorsed by the U.S. Government, otherwise there wouldn't be a department devoted to printing them. The section you added is more appropriate for the Federal Reserve Note article because your addition doesn't deal with Silver Certificates. Even if Federal Reserve Notes can be backed by silver in the future, they are still FRNs.

"Silver Certificates were abolished by Congress on June 4, 1963 and all redemption in silver ceased on June 24, 1968. Thus, the United States no longer has a paper currency that is legal tender for the purchase of goods & services, as any vendor may refuse to accept Federal Reserve Notes as officially stated at: http://www.treasury.gov/education/faq/currency/legal-tender.html#q1 However, the Federal Reserve Act has a poison pill provision which requires all said Notes to be redeemed in silver if Congress ever decides to abolish it. At such time a $1 Note should have the market value of one ounce of silver. In the meantime, the market has discounted such a possibility by valuing a $1 Note to be the amount of silver that it will buy as the inverse of the current spot price per ounce."

By the way, could someone please post a link to the "poison pill" clause of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913?

If no one replies to this post by December 31, 2005, this section will be deleted. If you are the author of the questioned section, please write on this page your reasoning behind the addition.

-rcnj Numismatic Article Writer

Edited To Add (10-20-2005): It already appears someone has taken the initiative in removing this material.

[edit] Poison pill clause

In addition to the lack of citation, this paragraph makes assertions unlikely on their face. Since a silver dollar was not one ounce fine at the time of passage of the Act, I cannot believe that redemption ounce-for-dollar would be provided for. This whole section looks OR and doubtful. Robert A.West (Talk) 20:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

The US mint quotes the Law of 1792 as defining a dollar as "three hundred and seventy-one grains and four sixteenth parts of a grain of pure, or four hundred and sixteen grains of standard silver". An ounce Troy Avoirdupois is 437.5 grains, and therefore this may be either a rounding by the source, or a 5% premium, which is not prohibitive.

I note with some amusement that the Eagle is defined as "EAGLES--each to be of the value of ten dollars or units, and to contain two hundred and forty-seven grains and four eighths of a grain of pure, or two hundred and seventy grains of standard gold." This is 15.4:1.

Crime of 1873 does not belong in the intro under that name; even in scare quotes, that's not neutral phrasing. Septentrionalis 20:59, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

But the 1792 act was not in force when the Fed was established. The Morgan and Peace dollars were the current circulating dollars at the time, at 338.38 grains fine, which is considerably less than an ounce. Robert A.West (Talk) 08:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Source? This site says 412.5 grains of .900 silver, which would be 371.25 grains fine. But I have made (and now correct) a far more serious error, which leads me to agree in doubting this; the odds that any currency act would involved avoirdupois ounces of silver is wanishingly small. Septentrionalis 18:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

I've removed it again: with tags, it was

However, the Federal Reserve Act has a poison pill provision which requires all said Notes to be redeemed in silver if Congress ever decides to abolish it (subject to Congress amending that provision).^{[citation needed]} At such time a $1 note should have the market value of one ounce of silver.^[dubious — see talk page] In the meantime, the market has discounted such a possibility by valuing a $1 note to be the amount of silver that it will buy as the inverse of the current spot price per ounce.^[original research?]

Sources for any of this are welcome. Septentrionalis 00:15, 30 November 2006 (UTC)