User talk:Signinstranger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello, Signinstranger, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 17:15, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Dashes on Samuel Beckett

Hello. I'm leaving a message regarding your changes to the dashes on the Samuel Beckett article.

While I appreciate your "proofreader's eye" (I am an editor myself) and your effort in that regard, please note that conventions (as per Wikipedia's guidelines) are not monolithic; the em-dash without surrounding spaces is an accepted convention, and is the one that I chose to use in the article (as I do in all of my work). —Saposcat 06:59, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Dashes on Samuel Beckett

While I am a great fan of the Chicago Manual of Style and its acceptance of em-dashes as closed up to the text on either side, my personal belief is that they're a lot easier to read on webpages when surrounded by spaces.

However, I didn't mean to tread on your toes, and apologize for arbitrarily changing your preference. I am satisfied with your reversion of the page to the way it was before my clumsy feet intruded. So sorry! I shall be careful to avoid changing your em-dash style on any articles I see that you have contributed. Cheers! Signinstranger 07:55, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Schippers.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Schippers.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:07, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Alsop_Marin3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alsop_Marin3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:12, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Cato.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cato.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:FSFJuly1963.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FSFJuly1963.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 4 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:FSFJuly1963.jpg)

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:FSFJuly1963.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 11:41, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sonnets

Hi. I noticed you are adding Shakespeare sonnets, and was wonder if there was a reason you weren't putting a space between the quatrains. Personally, I find it makes them easier to read. Conrad Leviston 15:58, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment. I don't see spacing the quatrains as much of a convention in either online or printed versions of the sonnets. The prime source I've been using for the text is www.shakespeare-online.com, but my copy of the Signet Shakespeare leaves the sonnets without spacing, only indenting the final couplet. If I add a space between the quatrains in the sonnets I've already posted, I'll probably end up going through the entire corpus of already posted sonnets to do this. Your thoughts? Signinstranger 16:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Certainly consistancy is more important than doing it one way or the other. I suppose it comes down to the fact that if I am the one who feels strongly about this, I should be the one who does the boring job of standardising, so you may as well leave things as they are for the moment. Cheers. Conrad Leviston 16:38, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
If you feel deeply about it, then I don't mind going ahead. As picky as I am, I'll probably be looking through all the sonnet pages anyway, and it's a fairly easy edit. It may take me a while, though. Signinstranger 17:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
On second thought, I'm going to leave them as is. If you want to change them, go for it, but to my eye the sonnets look better unbroken. It's only 14 lines, after all. Signinstranger 17:59, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Horrible sentence in "American classical music"

I honestly have no memory of having written that, but the history shows I did. Looks like I am perfectly capable of writing crap. Oh well. Maybe I was drunk. I removed a lot of it. :-) Antandrus (talk) 00:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Science Fiction Magazine

My assumption is that by referring to Sci-Fiction as the "premiere" e-zine, you meant the leading e-zine, so I changed "premiere" to "premier". If you meant "premiere" in the sense of "first." why not just use "first"? Cheers! Signinstranger 20:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)


Yes, that was excellent editorial action on your part. My only comments regarding the action are 1) I didn't choose the word "premiere" for this article; someone else did; and 2) I had the same thoughts about the word (whether the writer meant "premiere" or "premier"), but left the "e" on because in the writer's version of the article, a misspelled version of "premiere" was used, so I decided the writer might have meant that particular word ("premiere"). Yet, privately, I believed "premier" to be a better choice. Check the history of the article to see where I corrected the misspelled word. Thanks for the note. All the best! -- Paul 09:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:PRMerkley"

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Star beast.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Star beast.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)