Significance (policy debate)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Part of the series Policy Debate |
|
 |
|
| Organization | |
| Policy debate competitions |
|
| Format | |
| Structure of policy debate · Resolution |
|
| Participants | |
|
Affirmative · Negative · Judge |
|
| Types of Arguments | |
|
Stock Issues · Case· Disadvantage |
|
| Argumentative Concepts | |
Significance is a stock issue in policy debate which establishes the importance of the harms in the status quo. As a stock issue has fallen out of favor with the debate community almost all debaters and judges now believe that any plan which is preferable to the status quo is significant.
Signficance derives from the word "substantially" which appears in most resolutions, and one can argue that Significance has been subsumed by the option for the negative to use a Topicality violation on that word.
| Stock Issues |
|---|
|
Topicality| Solvency| Harms| Inherency| Significance |
 |
This Speech and Debate-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
