User talk:Sidp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Graham ☺ | Talk 19:11, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Punctuation, HTML character entities

Before you do mass edits of punctuation and other style issues, please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style and its related articles. English style issues are a point of heated contention in Wikipedia's global audience, so we've spent tens (maybe hundreds) of thousands of people-hours crafting style policies that can accomodate the conflicting standards that exist not only between countries, but even between school systems and publishers within each country.

Specifically, please note that WP's policy on punctuation and quotes splits the difference between American and British usage by using "double quotes" for quoting, but placing punctuation outside the quotes unless it is actually part of the quoted text. Also, Wikipedia uses Unicode characters, so please don't use HTML character entities (like – and —) unless the character is not a common Unicode character. Edit windows have a convenient set of clickable Unicode characters below the Save/Preview/Show changes buttons to make text insertion easy. Thank you for your cooperation. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 10:21, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Jeff, thanks for the guidance. It's really the best way to learn these matters in Wikipedia (though less efficient for others). I must admit, however, that my misinformed activities regarding dashes is taken directly from Wikipedia's own style directives. As for comma placement, I am still not clear on what specifically I did that you refer to. Usually I keep the comma outside a quote that would not be a part of language (such as a title). Otherwise, I hardly ever make a correction on this issue because I know there are multiple accepted styles. Feel free to set me straight. Thanks again for your help. SidP 19:04, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Please forgive me for not citing the specific edit that caused me to comment. I normally include the links to make my points clear, but my failure this time, combined with your rapid editing, made it rather challenging to identify the article I had a problem with. I was thinking specifically of your otherwise excellent edit [1] to Firefly (TV series). The particular problems I saw were moving a comma inside a quoted phrase ("Earth that was"), and unnecessarily changing Unicode en-dashes (–) into their equivalent HTML character entities (–).
I also didn't provide specific links to the relevant policies, Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Quotation marks and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dashes). Taking another look at them, I can see the potential confusion with the dash policy at least, because it currently is somewhat unclear about the use of character entities. On the one hand, it says (in "Dashes and hyphens used on Wikipedia" to "use the HTML entity —, which the MediaWiki engine automatically converts into a numeric entity in the rendered HTML". On the other hand, in the intro section of the article, in bold, it says "Now that Wikipedia uses UTF-8, these can be entered directly into the article markup. To enter an em dash after your cursor, for instance, you can click the "—" link below the edit box". The confusion probably comes from someone adding the bold statement, once Wikipedia switched to UTF-8, without bothering to update the remaining text to reflect this change. (Worse, the first statement is now in error, as the MediaWiki engine now converts – to a UTF-8 character, not a numeric entity.) I've posted a note on the dash-policy talk page to ask that they update it. Again, I apologize for the lack of details. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 11:53, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nick Gulas

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Nick Gulas, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. JFreeman 05:20, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

(From User_talk:JFreeman):
==received warning for something I didn't do==
JFreeman, I was very surprised to be admonished for "work" on an entry that I didn't do. I will be glad to help clean up the Nick Gulas article, but perhaps you meant to send your warning to someone else? Please respond.--SidP 05:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

SidP, I apologize. You're correct; the vandal was someone from an anonymous IP address (205.188.117.14). I was running Lupin's Filter recent changes script to watch for vandalism, and I apparently clicked on the "warn" link for the wrong message after I had reverted the Nick Gulas change. Please accept my apologies for wrongly sending the warning to you, and thanks for letting me know about it. --JFreeman 18:15, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] About Saizen

(moved to Saizen talk page)

[edit] Hyphens and dashes

There's no need to edit an article just to replace hyphens in date ranges with en dashes. WP:DATE says "Ranges of dates are given with a spaced or unspaced hyphen or en dash (–)." Since either is acceptable, the original edit should be left unless there are inconsistent uses (some dates with spaced hyphens, some dates with unspace en dashes) within the article. -- JHunterJ 12:24, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Legionnaires

Sidp, most of the LSH are redundant entries. Per Garth Ranzz, many (Ayla Ranzz, Triplicate Girl and Apparition for example) are being merged into a single document to cover all three. Before simply creating redirects and invalidating entries, please discuss on the appropriate topic page(s). --Squashua 21:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Merging the documents is a good idea, perhaps, or perhaps not. However, an entry that has no content and is merely the real name of a fictional character hardly needs a review for merging. Isn't that adhering to an overly strict methodology? I'm just trying to help. --SidP 22:49, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
I was just trying to stick with the guidelines; allowing one month of review discussion from proposal time. An issue I have with Garth Ranzz is that it probably should be Lightning Lad with Garth Ranzz and one of the Live Wire entries (there are two different Live Wires in the DC Universe) redirecting to it. I was just working from a prior example. Maybe you can help me clear this up? I'd rather have someone like you helping with this sort of overblown cleanup. --Squashua 16:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Picket Fence

Hi there. I was wondering what the First Period (referred to in the article Picket Fence is), partly because it seems like there's a picket fence in the background to Fra Angelico's Annunciation Anyway, any info appreciated! LEN 03:58, 22 November 2006 (UTC)